POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN THE RESEARCH LENSE OF THE CONTEMPORARY CRITICAL STUDIES

Dr. Milena Pešić

Abstract

Starting from the thesis that critical discourse studies, with their qualitative, critical and explanatory approach to the study of political communication, represent a valuable complement to the dominant approaches that privilege the positivist paradigm and quantitative research, in this paper we tried to provide more complex insights into the scientific contributions of these studies to the study of political discourse, through observing the specifics of their theoretical-methodological frameworks, analytical categories and interpretive procedures. For this purpose, some of the key features of Teun van Dijk’s sociocognitive approach, Paul Chilton’s cognitive-linguistic approach, Ruth Wodak’s discursive-historical approach and Norman Fairclough’s dialectical-relational argumentative approach were considered. In the introductory part of the paper, we provided an overview of the general distinctive features, main starting points and research interests of the critical analysis of political discourse, as well as an insight into the basic dilemma related to the scope of the content of the term “political discourse”. The central part of the work consists of two complementary parts. In the first part, we started from the presentation of the analytical aspects of the following levels and dimensions of the political discourse structure: topics, superstructures or textual schemata, local semantics, lexicon, syntax, rhetoricand speech acts. Using an analytical-synthetic approach, we connected the semantic-grammatical dimensions of the textual level and the cognitive-pragmatic dimensions of the discursive level of production and analysis of political discourse. The second part of the central part of the work is focused on the presentation of the theoretical framework of the argumentative approach to political discourse, as a kind of upgrade and reframing of existing conceptual settings and analytical categories. In the concluding review of the insights reached in the article, as the main scientific contribution of critical studies of political discourse, we singled out the way in which is achieved the synthesis of systemic, but contextually sensitive textual analysis on the one hand, and descriptive, normative and explanatory viewpoints of critical social research, on the other.

References

Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: a critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chilton Paul and Christina Schaffner. 1997 “Discourse and Politics”, Discourse as Social Interaction Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction Volume 2. ed. Teun A. van Dijk, 206–230. First published in 1997. Reprinted 1997, 1998, 2000. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://rmit.libguides.com/ebooks/taylorfrancis

Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner. 2002. “Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse”. Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, eds. Chilton Paul and Christina Schäffner, 1–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Dunmire, Patricia. 2012. “Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and     the Politics of Language”. Language and Linguistics Compass 6/11, 735–751. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lnc3.365.

Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak, R. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse as Social Interaction. ed. Teun, Van Dijk, (2): 258 – 284. London: Sage.

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. 2006. “Genres in Political Discourse”. Encyclopedia of Language &         Linguistics. ed. Keith Brown, 32 –38. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854- 2/00719-7

Fairclough, Norman and Isabela Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. 2015. Language and Power. Third edition. Oxon, New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman and Isabela Fairclough. 2016. “Textual Analysis”. Routledge Handbook of   Interpretative Political Science. eds. Bevir Mark and Roderich Arthur Willliam, 186–198. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Fairclough, Norman. 2018. “CDA as dialectical reasoning”. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 13–25. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

Farrelly, Michael. 2010. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Political Studies: an illustrative analysis of the ‘empowerment’ agenda” , Politics.  30. 2. 98-104, London: Political Studies Association.

Filardo-Llamas Laura and Michael S. Boyd. 2018. „Critical discourse analysis and politics“. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. 2018, ed. John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 312 –327. Oxon, New York: Routledge. 

Flowerdew, John, and John E. Richardson. 2018. “Introduction”. The Routledge Handbook of   Critical Discourse Studies, ed. John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 1–10. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

Lewinski, Marcin. 2014. “Review of: Isabela Fairclough and Norman Fairclough, Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students”. Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, 6 (1), 169–175. London: Routledge

Machin David, and Andrea, Mayr. 2012. How to do Critical Discourse Analysis A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage Publication

Mazid, Bahaa-eddin M. 2014. CDA and PDA Made Simple. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Mulderrig Jane, Nicolina Montesano Montessori and Michael Farrelly. 2019. “Introducing critical policy discourse analysis”. Critical Policy Discourse Analysis, eds. Nicolina Montesano Montessori, Michael Farrelly, Jane Mulderrig Farrelly, 1–22. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Pešić, Milena. 2020. „Razvoj pojma diskursa kao instrumenta kritičke društvene analize” Sociološki pregled 54(4), 1260 –1278. Beograd: Srpsko sociološko društvo.

Pešić, Milena. 2022. “Critical discourse analysis as a critical social study: Norman Fairclough’s   approach”, Политичка ревија 4/2022, 89–113. Београд: Институт за политичке      студије. https://doi.org/10.22182/pr.7442022.4 

Pešić, Milena, Sanja Stošić. 2019. „Kritička analiza diskursa i politika”, Srpka politička misao 4/2019, 391–407, Beograd: Institut za političke studije. doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.6532019.17

Sengul, Kurt. 2019. “Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: a case study       of right-wing populist discourse in Australia”. Communication Research and Practice, Volume 5.  376 –392, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082

van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. “What is political discourse analysis?”. Political Linguistics eds. Jan Bloomaert and Chris Bulcaen,  11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, Teun A. 2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity”. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, eds. Wodak, Ruth, Michael, Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage Publications.

van Dijk, Teun A. 2002. “Political discourse and political cognition“. Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, eds. Chilton Paul and Christina Schäffner, 203–237. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. “Politics, ideology and discourse”. Encyclopedia of Language and      Linguistics. Volume on Politics and Language. ed. Ruth Wodak, 728–740. Boston: Elsevier.

van Dijk, Teun A. 2007. “Ideology and discourse analysis“. Journal of Political Ideologies 11:2, 115 –140. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908

van Dijk, Teun A. 2016. “CDS: A Sociocognitive Approach”. Methods of critical discourse studies, Third edition, eds. Ruth Wodak and Meyer Michael, 63–85. London: Sage Publication.

Wang, Jiayu. 2016. A New Political and Communication Agenda for Political Discourse Analysis:        Critical Reflections on Critical Discourse Analysis and Political Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Communication 10, 2766–2784. Los Angeles: USC Annenberg         Press. 

Wilson John. 2003.“Political Discourse”. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (eds. Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton), 398‒415. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Wilson, John. 2015. Political Discourse.The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Second Edition. eds. Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 775 –794. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Vukotić Stamatović, Milica. 2020. Diskurs parlamenta. Podgorica: Univerzitet Crne Gore.

Wodak, Rut. 2001. “What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments”. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, eds. Wodak, Ruth, Michael, Meyer, 1–13 London: Sage Publications.

Wodak, Ruth. and Michael Meyer. 2016. “Critical discourse study: history, agenda, theory, methodology”. Methods of critical discourse studies, Third edition, eds. Ruth Wodak, and Meyer Michael, 1–23. London: Sage Publication.

Wodak, Ruth and Markus Rheindorf. 2022. Identity, Politics, Past and Present. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.