The end of History, Culture of Megalopolis and Geopolitics of Polis

Dušan Proroković

Sažetak

“The End of History” that Fukuyama predicted did not mean only the final triumph of liberal democracy, but also the final triumph of the Western civilization. Western values ​​are transferred through the Culture of Megalopolis. This Culture aims to be globally accepted, universal and therefore able to assimilate all Poleis that exist in the world. However, it has been shown that traditional societies do not accept the Culture of Megalopolis because of the perception that it would lead to gradual political, economic and cultural peripherization. This is how the Culture of Polis, as an element of geopolitical positioning of regional powers is formed.

Reference

1. Barnett, T. (2004) The Pentagon’s New Map. New York: Putnam Publishing Group.
2. Danilevski, N. (1994) Rusija i Evropa. Beograd: Službeni list.
3. Dugin, A. (2009) Geopolitika postmoderne.  Beograd: Prevodilačka radionica “Rosić“: IKP “Nikola Pašić“.
4. Ferguson, N. (2012) Civilization: The West and the Rest. London: Penguin Books.
5. Fukuyama, F. (1989) “The End of History?”. The National Interest, No. 16 (Summer): 3-18.
6. Fukuyama, F. (2002) Kraj istorije i poslednji čovek.  Podgorica: CID.
7. Fukuyama, F. (2014) “At the ‘End of History’ Still Stands Democracy.” The Wall Street Journal [online]. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/at-the-end-of-history-still-stands-democracy-1402080661 [accessed December 29^th 2014].
8. Hantington, S. (2000) Sukob civilizacija. Podgorica: CID.
9. Turen, A. (2011) Nova Paradigma. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
10. Wallerstein, I. (1974) The Modern World System, New York: Аcademic Press.
11. Vladušić, S. (2013) “Virtuelni stanovnik Megalopolisa”. Мatica srpska, 191(1-2): 118-130.
12. Zinovjev, A. (2002) Zapad: fenomen zapadnjaštva. Beograd: Naš dom.