Tema broja

OGLEDI I STUDIJE

SLOŽENOST KORPORATIVIZMA I TEŠKOĆE NJEGOVOG RAZUMEVANJA I ODREĐENJA

Sažetak

Korporativizam je složen politički fenomen dugog trajanja, velike složenosti i raznorodnosti, mnogostrukih oblika i lica. Ta složenost je uslovila različite teškoće njegovog razumevanja i određivanja, kao i različite pristupe tome. U ovome članku uporedno je prikazano šest poznatijih definicija korporativizma, karakterističnih po različitim gledištima na njega: društveno-organizacionom, institucionalnom, procesnom, institucionalno-procesnom, ekonomskom i doktrinarnom. Potom je ukazano na četiri teškoće za razumevanje i određenje korporativizma: različita značenja ovog pojma, širok spektar onoga što se pod njime podrazumeva, stigmatizacija samog izraza korporativizam i naposletku njegova pogrešna upotreba. Na kraju je iznet predlog minimalne definicije korporativizma, kojom se mogu obuhvatiti analizirane razlike i prevazići analizirane teškoće, koja bi ga dovoljno razlikovala od drugih političkih fenomena.

Ključne reči:

Reference

    • Carpenter, L.P. 1976. “Corporatism in Britain, 1930–45.” Journal of Contemporary History 11(1): 3–25.
    • Chalmers, Douglas A. (1991) “Corporatism and Comparative Politics.” In New Directions in Comparative Politics ed. Howard J. Wiarda, 59–81. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    • Cox, Andrew. 1988. “The Old and New Testaments of Corporatism: Is it a Political Form or a Method of Policy-making?” Political Studies, XXXVI: 294–308.
    • Dirkem, Emil. 1972. O podeli društvenog rada. Beograd: Prosveta.
    • Gierke, Otto von. 1900 [1881]. Political Theories of the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Halevi, Joseph. 1990. “Corporatism.” In Problems of the Planned Economy eds. John Eatwell, Murray Milgate & Peter Newman, 77–79. London & Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Limited.
    • Huo, Jingjing and John D. Stephens. 2015. “From Industrial Corporatism to the Social Investment State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, eds. Stephan Leibfried et al., 410–425. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.
    • Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1977. “Liberal Corporatism and Party Government.” Comparative Political Studies 10: 91–126.
    • Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1984. “Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks.” In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. John Goldthorpe, 60–80. Oxford: Clarenon Press.
    • Leo XIII, Pope. 1891. Rerum Novarum http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html.
    • Manoïlesco, Mihail. 1934. Le siècle du corporatisme : Doctrine du corporatisme integral et pur. Paris : Librairie Félix Alcan.
    • Miller Lane, Barbara and Leila J. Rupp. 1978. Nazi Ideology Before 1933: A Documentation. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    • Pahl, Raymond Edward & Jack T. Winkler. 1975. “The Coming Corporatism.” Challenge Vol. 18(1): 28–35.
    • Panitch, Leo. 1980. “Recent Theorizations of Corporatism: Reflections on a Growth Industry.” The British Journal of Sociology 31(2): 159–187.
    • Schmitter, Phillipe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The Review of Politics 36(1): 85–131.
    • Therborn, Göran. 1992. “Lessons from ‘Corporatist’ Theorizations.” In Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System?, eds. Pekkarinen, Jukka, Matti Pohjola & Bob Rowthorn, 24–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Wiarda, Howard J. 1990. “Rethinking Political Development: A Look Backward over Thirty Years, And a Look Forward.” Studies in Comparative International Development 24(4): 65–82.
    • Wiarda, Howard J. 1997. Corporatism and Comparative Politics: the other great “ism”. London: M.E. Sharpe.
    • Wiarda, Howard J. 1998. “Is comparative politics dead? Rethinking the field in the post-Cold War era.” Third World Quarterly 19(5): 935–949.
PERIODIKA Srpska politička misao 3/2020 3/2020 УДК 321.01:342.393 243-267
ç