Izaberi jezik:
  • Naslovna
  • Publikacije
  • POLITIKA PRAVA NA PRIVATNOST I ZAŠTITA PODATAKA O LIČNOSTI NA INTERNETU: STUDIJA SLUČAJA TURSKE
Tema broja

AKTUELNO

POLITIKA PRAVA NA PRIVATNOST I ZAŠTITA PODATAKA O LIČNOSTI NA INTERNETU: STUDIJA SLUČAJA TURSKE

Danica Lazović

Sažetak

Pravo na privatnost i pravo na zaštitu podataka o ličnosti postaju jedno od najznačajnijih pitanja u oblasti vladavine prava i poštovanja fundamentalnih prava i sloboda. Razvitak modernih tehnologija, a pre svega interneta je doprineo uvećanju značaja ovih prava ali i sve većoj pažnji koju im nacionalne i međunarodne institucije pridaju. Republika Turska, kao jedna od najznačajnijih država na međunarodnom planu, po svom strateškom položaju, ekonomskoj, političkoj i vojnoj moći, dospela je u središte interesovanja medija, međunarodnih i nadnacionalnih organizacija poput Ujedinjenih nacija i Evropske unije u kontekstu procene poštovanja ljudskih prava i sloboda. Političke promene nastale usvajanjem ustavnih amandmana koji su načelno prepoznali značaj navedenih prava, suprotno očekivanjima, doprinele su njihovom većem kršenju i rastu moći izvršne vlasti, pri čemu turski politički sistem sve više dobija karakteristike hiperprezidencijalizma. Osnovna pitanja na koje će rad nastojati da odgovori odnose se na rasvetljavanje stvarnog značaja i sadržaja ovih prava, postojanost turske legislative u odnosnoj oblasti i ispitivanje uticaja legislative na stvarno stanje po pitanju njihovog poštovanja. Budući da je Republika Turska država koja pretenduje na članstvo u Evropskoj uniji, biće neophodno razmotriti i pravno nasleđe Evropske unije u ovoj oblasti.

Ključne reči:

Reference

    • Европски суд за људска права [ЕСЉП]. 2021. Европска конвенција о људским правима. Стразбур: Европски суд за људска права. Последњи приступ: 12. јануар 2023. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_SRP.pdf.
    • Европски суд за људска права [ЕСЉП]. 2021. ЕСЉП у 50. питања. Стразбур: Европски суд за људска права. Последњи приступ: 12. јануар 2023. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/50Questions_SRP.pdf
    • Akgül, Mustafa, and Melih Kırlıdoğ. 2015. “Internet Censorship in Turkey.” Internet Policy Review 4 (2): 1–22. doi:10.14763/2015.2.366.
    • Aydin, Deniz Duru. 2015. “Turkey v. Encryption: An Attack on Freedom of Expression.” Accessnow. Last accessed: 17. November 2022. https://www.accessnow.org/turkey-v-encryption-an-attack-on-freedom-of-expression/
    • Charter (EU) No. 2007/C 303/01 of the European Parliament, European Commission and Council on fundamental rights of the European Union., OJ C 303/1, 14.12.2007.
    • Council of Europe [COE], n.d. “A Convention to protect your rights and liberties”. Council of Europe. Last accessed: 19. January 2023. https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-convention
    • Directive (EU) No. 95/46/1995 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data., OJ L 281, 23.11.1995.
    • European Commission [EC]. 2012. “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation)”. European Commission. Last accessed: 13. December 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0011:FIN:en:PDF
    • European Commission [EC]. 2019. “What Is Personal Data?” European Commission. Last accessed: 1. December 2022 https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/what-personal-data_en.
    • Freedom House [FH]. 2020. “Turkey: Freedom on the Net 2020 Country Report”. Freedom House. Last accessed: 29. October 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/country/turkey/freedom-net/2020.
    • Human Rights Watch [HRW]. 2020. “Turkey: Spy Agency Law Opens Door to Abuse.” Human Rights Watch. Last accessed: 27. December 2022. https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/04/29/turkey-spy-agency-law-opens-door-abuse.
    • Kanun No. 7253., “Resmi Gazete”, Sayı: 31202/2020. Last accessed: 7. December 2022. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2020/07/20200731-1.htm.
    • Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurumu. [KVKK]. 2019. “Data protection in Turkey”. Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurumu. Last accessed: 14. December 2022. https://www.kvkk.gov.tr/Icerik/5389/Data-Protection-in-Turkey.
    • Kokott, Juliane, and Christoph Sobotta. 2013. “The distinction between privacy and data protection in the jurisprudence of the CJEU and the ECHR.” International Data Privacy Law 3 (4): 222–228. doi: 10.1093/idpl/ipt017.
    • Letsch, Constanze. 2014. “Turkey Pushes through New Raft of ‘Draconian’ Internet Restrictions.” The Guardian. Last accessed: 16. December 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/06/turkey-internet-law-censorship-democracy-threat-opposition.
    • London Privacy International [LPI]. 2014. “Report Universal Periodic Review – Stakeholder Report 21st Session, Turkey – The Right to Privacy in Turkey.” London Privacy International. Last accessed: 16. December 2022. https://uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/downloadfile.aspx?filename=1400&file=EnglishTranslation.
    • Özer, Yusuf Mansur. 2020. “Parliament Finally Amends Internet: New Social Media Regulations and Removal of Content.” IR Global. Last accessed: 18. January 2023. https://www.irglobal.com/article/parliament-finally-amends-internet-law-new-social-media-regulations-and-removal-of-content/.
    • Prosser, William L. 1960. “Privacy.” California Law Review 48 (3): 383–423. doi: 10.2307/3478805.
    • Regulation (EU) No. 679/2016 of the European parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)., OJ L 119/1, 27.04.2016, p.32–33.
    • Reynolds, Osborne Jr. 1969. “Privacy and Freedom. by Alan F. Westin.” Administrative Law Review 22 (1):101–106. doi: 10.1093/sw/13.4.114-a.
    • Rodriguez, Katitza, and Hilal Temel. 2020. “Turkey Doubles down on Violations of Digital Privacy and Free Expression.” Electronic Frontier Foundation. Last accessed: 4. December 2022. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/11/turkey-doubles-down-violations-digital-privacy-and-free-expression.
    • Şahin, Zeynep. 2022. “Evaluati̇on of the Law No. 7253 on Amendment of the Law on the regulati̇on of Broadcasts Made on Internet and Combating Crimes commi̇tted through These Broadcasts i̇n the Context of Freedom of Expression and Personal Rights.” Euroasia Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 9 (2): 28–44. doi: 10.38064/eurssh.332.
    • The Grand National Assembly of Turkey. 2019. “Constitution of the Republic of Türkiye.” The Grand National Assembly of Turkey. Last accessed: 10. December 2022. https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/media/7258/anayasa_eng.pdf.
    • United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner [OHCHR]. n.d. “Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Last accessed: 7. December 2022. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/cnr.pdf.
    • Ünver, Akın. 2018. “The Logic of Secrecy: Digital Surveillance in Turkey and Russia.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 17 (2): 93–103. Last accessed: 11. November 2022. http://turkishpolicy.com/article/923/the-logic-of-secrecy-digital-surveillance-in-turkey-and-russia.
    • Warf, Barney. 2010. “Geographies of Global Internet Censorship.” GeoJournal 76 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s10708-010-9393-3.
    • Warren, Samuel D. and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4 (5): 193–220. doi: 10.2307/1321160.
PERIODIKA Politička revija 2/2023 2/2023 УДК 342.738:004.056(560) 004.738.5:351.083.8(560) 219-236
https://doi.org/10.5937/pr76-43696
Link ka izdanju časopisa Politička revija - 2/2023
ç