MOGUĆNOST PROUČAVANJA RAZVIJENOSTI OPŠTINA ZEMALJA U TRANZICIJI PRIMENOM MULTIVARIJACIONE ANALIZE

Slobodan Nićin

Nevenka D. Nićin

Sažetak

U radu se razmatraju socioekonomska situacija i razvoj opština u Federaciji BiH. U obzir su uzeti odgovarajući socioekonomski pokazatelji u koje spadaju prosečna neto plata stanovnika, pokrivenost uvoza izvozom, udeo aktivnog u ukupnom stanovništvu, udeo stanovnika sa visokim i višim obrazovanjem kod nezaposlenog stanovništva, izvoz po glavi stanovnika i pokrivenost stanovništva zdravstvenim osobljem. Kao osnovni pokazatelj razvijenosti opština uzet je indeks razvijenosti opština izveden na bazi nekoliko promenljivih (stepen nezaposlenosti, stepen zaposlenosti, udeo učenika u stanovništvu, BDP i indeks odsutnosti stanovništva). Da bi se utvrdilo koji od navednih relevantnih promenljivih u najvećoj meri objašnjavaju vrednost ovog indeksa korišćen je metod diskriminacione analize. Izvršena je klasifikacija opština prema stepenu razvijenosti. Dobijeni rezultati ukazuju na heterogenost opština Federacije BiH u pogledu razvijenosti.

Reference

1. Baum, Scott, „The Socio-spatial Structure of Australia’s Metropolitan  Regions“, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2004.
2. Gouvêa, Maria Aparecida, Farina, Milton Carlos, Varela, Patricia S. „The Differentiation of the Groups 4 e 5 of Municipalities in the state of São Paulo according to IPRS and Based on the Constitutional Transferences and Income Tributary Taxes – an Application of the Discriminant Analysis”, Review of Business Management, Vol 9, No 24, 2007.
3. Guryanova, Lidiya , Kholodnyi, Gennadyi O., Lukyanchikova, Anna S., „Methods and models of analysis of spatial clusterisation of rates of socio-economic development of regions”, The Problems of Economy, issue 2, p. 242-250, 2013.
4. Gwary, Mwada M., Gwary, T.M., Mustapha, Shettima B., „Discriminant Analysis of the Influence of Farmers’ Socio-Economic Characteristics on their Participation in Research and Extension Activities in Borno State, Nigeria”, International Research Journal of Social Sciences,Vol. 1(4), 1-6, 2012.
5. Dellaportas George, „Classification of Nations as Developed and Less Developed: An Arrangement by Discriminant Analysis of Socioeconomic Data”, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 42, No. 2, pp. 153-166, 1983.
6. Jaba, Elisabeta,Jemna, Danut Vasile,Viorica, Daniela,Balan, Christiana Brigitte, „Discriminant analysis in the study of romanian regional economic development”, Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iasi – Stiinte Economice, vol. 54, pages 147-153,
7. Kar, Jyotirmayee, „Income Inequality in Some Major European Union Economies – A Discriminant Analysis”, Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 12(4), 117-128,
8. Ohajianya, Donatus Otuiheoma, „Discriminant Analysis of Rural Households Unemployment status in Imo State, Nigeria, Greener Journal of Social Sciences,Vol. 2 (6), pp. 230-236,
9. Stimson, Robert,Baum, Scott,Van Gellecum, Yolanda, „A Typology of Economic and Human Capital Performance Across Australia’s Large and Medium Sized Regional Towns”, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3,
10. Sharma, Manoj , Khosla, Rajiv, „Regional Disparities in India’s Industrial Development: Discriminant Function Approach”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2013.
11. Fernandes, Silvia, „An empirical approach of the distinctive aspects for socioeconomic development”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 40, Iss: 11, pp. 956-970,
12. Hill, Edward W., Brennan, John F., Wolman, Harold L., „What is a central city in the United States?-Applying a statistical technique for developing taxonomies”, Urban Studies 35 (11), 1935-1969, 1998.
13. Ho, Ka Man, Dinov, Ivo, „An Empirical Study on Economic Prosperity and Peace”, UCLA Undergraduate Science Journal,Vol.26, 2013.