INTERRELIGIJSKI DIJALOG I POLITIKA: NIJE PITANjE „ŠTA“ VEĆ „KAKO“?

Marko Veković

Sažetak

Iako svetske religije imaju mnogo toga zajedničkog, istorija sveta prepuna je primera kako su politika i politički akteri bili veoma efikasni u instrumentalizaciji onog što ih razdvaja i deli u cilju postizanja političkih ciljeva. Neretko se dešavalo i obrnuto. To su, između ostalog, i razlozi zašto je istorija svetskih religija u stvari istorija sukoba i ratova. Interreligijski dijalog predstavlja jedan od pokušaja prevazilaženja nesuglasica između svetskih religija. U skladu sa tim, osnovna teza koju autor dokazuje u ovom radu jeste da interreligijski dijalog ima važnu (geo)političku dimenziju i funkciju. Međutim, ova dimenzija interreligijskog dijaloga dugo je bila zanemarivana. Posledično, postoji jaz u, pre svega, domaćoj literaturi u istraživanju političke dimenzije interreligijskog dijaloga. U radu koristim relevantnu polit-religiološku literaturu i na savremenim primerima dokazujemo koliko je (geo)politička dimenzija interreligijskog dijaloga važna za istraživače i kako iskoristiti interreligijski dijalog u cilju jačanja demokratskih potencijala savremenih društava.

Reference

• Abu-Nimer, Mohammed and Renata K. Smith. 2016. “Interreligious and intercultural education for dialogue, peace and social cohesion.”, International Review of Education, 62 (4): 394–405.
• Abu-Nimer, Mohammed, Amal I. Khoury, and Emily Welty. 2007. Unity in Diversity: Interfaith Dialogue in the Middle East. Washington DC: US Institute for Peace.
• Australian Multicultural Council. 2014. “Interfaith and social cohesion in Australia: looking to the future”. Last accessed on 19 June 2021. https://religionsforpeaceaustralia.org.au/download/amc_interfaith_report.pdf
• Berger, Piter. 2008. Desekularizacija sveta, prepoporod religije i svetska politika. Novi Sad: Mediteran.
• Council of Europe, On the Religious Dimension of Intercultural Dialogue (8 April 2008). Last accessed June 5 2021. https://rm.coe.int/16805d37d8
• Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Giordan, Giuseppe, and Lynch, Andrew, (Eds). 2019. Interreligious Dialogue, From Religion to Geopolitics. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
• Giordan, Giuseppe, Adriana Michilli, and Siniša Zrinščak. 2019. “Interfaith Dialogue and Peacebuilding: A Case Study on Bosnia- Herzegovina’s Post-Conflict Educational System”, In Interreligious Dialogue, From Religion to Geopolitics, eds. Giuseppe Giordan and Andrew Lynch, 128-145. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
• Hantington, Semjuel P. 2004. Treći talas demokratizacije na kraju dvadesetog veka. Beograd: Stubovi kulture.
• Jevtić, Miroljub. 2016. „Religijski elemenat sukoba u Jugoslaviji (1992-2001).“ U Interpretacije jugoslovenskih sukoba i njihove posledice: između suštinskog neslaganja i dijaloga, urs. Goran Tepšić, Radmila Nakarada i Nemanja Džuverović, 131–144. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Beogradu i Forum ZDF.
• Kadayifci-Orellana, Ayse S. 2013. “Inter-religious Dialogue and Peacebuilding”, In Blackwell Companion to Inter-religious Dialogue, ed. Catherine Cornille, 149-167. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• King, Sallie. 2013. “Interreligious Dialogue.” In: The Oxford Handbook of Religious Diversity, ed. Chad Meister, 101–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kronish, Ron. 2008. “Interreligious dialogue in the service of peace”, CrossCurrents, 58 (2): 224-246.
• Küng, Hans. 1993. “Declaration Toward a Global Ethics.”, Last accessed on 5 June 2021. https://www.weltethos.org/1-pdf/10-stiftung/declaration/declaration_english.pdf
• Küng, Hans. 1995. Christianity: Essence, History and Future. London and New York: Continuum.
• Lehmann, Karsten. 2021. “Interreligious Dialogue in International Politics: from the margins of the religious field to the centre of civil society.” In Routledge International Handbook of Religion in Global Society, eds. Jayeel Cornelio, Francois Gauthier, Tuomas Martikainen, and Linda Woodhead, 305–314. London and New York: Routledge.
• Little, David and Scott Appleby. 2004. “A Moment of Opportunity? The Promise of Religious Peacebuilding in an Era of Religious and Ethnic Conflict.” In Religion and Peacebuilding, eds. Howard Coward and Gordon S. Smith, 1–23. Albany: University of New York Press.
• Mitra, Arpita. 2019. “Interreligious Education in a Post-secular World: The Relevance of the Radhakrishnan Commission’s Recommendations in the Indian Context.” In Interreligious Dialogue, From Religion to Geopolitics, eds. Giuseppe Giordan and Andrew Lynch, 275–291. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
• Philpott, Daniel. 2004. “Christianity and Democracy: The Catholic Wave.” Journal of Democracy, 15 (2): 32–46.
• Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review, 101 (3): 505–525.
• Stepan, Alfred. 2000. “Religion, Democracy, and the Twin Toleration.”, Journal of Democracy, 11 (4): 37–57.
• Swidler, Leonard. 1984. „Dekalog dijaloga, osnovna pravila medjureligijskog, medjuideološkog dijaloga.“ Poslednji pristup 19. јuna 2021. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5464ade0e4b055bfb204446e/t/551eaefae4b088bf54fe6528/1428074234671/Dialogue+Decalogue+-+Serbian+%28Cyrillic+Alphabet%29.pdf
• Swidler, Leonard. 2013a. “Deeper Meanings of Dialogue Today.”, Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 48 (2): 143–144.
• Swidler, Leonard. 2013b. “The History of Interreligious Dialogue.”, In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Inter-religious Dialogue, ed. Catherine Cornille, 3–19. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• Swidler, Leonard. 2014. Dialogue for Interreligious Understanding, Strategies for the Transformation of Culture-Shaping Institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Swidler, Leonard. 2016. The Age of Global Dialogue. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
• Swidler, Leonard and Paul Mojzes. 2000. The Study of Religion in the Age of Global Dialogue. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Swilder, Leonard, Khalid Duran, and Reuven Firestone. 2007. Trialogue, Jews, Christians and Muslims in Dialogue, New London. CT: Twenty-Third Publications.
• The Holy See. 2021a. “Dignitatis humanae.” Last accessed on 5 June 2021. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html
• The Holy See. 2021b. “Nostra Aetate.” Last accessed on 5 June 2021. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
• The Holy See. 2021c. “Unitatis redintegratio.” Last accessed on 5 June 2021. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html
• Toft, Monica D. 2011. “Religion, Rationality, and Violence.” In Religion and International Relations Theory, ed. Jack Snyder, 114–140. New York: Columbia University Press.
• N. General Assembly resolution 55/23, United Nations Year of Dialogue among Civilizations, A/RES/55/23 (11 January 2001). Last accessed on 5 June 2021. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/426950
• Veković, Marko and Veljko Đogatović. 2019. “Errando Discimus: Has post-Yugoslav Political and Social Science literature neglected religion?”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 58 (3): 753–763.
• Veković, Marko and Miroljub Jevtić. 2019. “Render unto Caesar: Explaining Political Dimension of the Autocephaly Demands in Ukraine and Montenegro.”, Journal of Church and State, 61 (4): 591–609.
• Vukomanović, Milan. 2001. “Religion, Conflict, Reconciliation.” In: Interreligijski dijalog kao vid pomirenja u Jugoistočnoj Evropi, urs. Milan Vukomanović i Marinko Vučinić, 22–27. Beograd: Čigoja štampa