Tema broja

spt2/2015

Housing Policy and Housing Market in Serbia

Sažetak

This article analyses housing policy and the quality of housing market in Serbia. Housing policy is analyzed in connection with policy of spatial and urban planning and building and construction policy, focusing on the housing availability as vital need in everyday life for each person, family and community in general. Numerous researches show that this policy field in Serbia has been pretty neglected, letting citizens alone to find their way on housing market. Above all that, this policy field is centralized, poorly coordinated between state and local government, and local government as important actor, still doesn`t have enough competencies and capacities for this kind of activity.  The analysis of housing market focuses on the most important factors that influence the housing demand and supply. Through empirical research was predicted how long it will take for housing to be approachable to population. The aim of this paper is to show the possible way for development of housing policy in Serbia, to procure more affordable housing market for citizens, upgrading the quality of their lives. The main methods used in this study are: analysis (quantitative and qualitative), comparative analysis, empirical research, and predictions of future developmental scenarios. The paper has two parts: housing policy and housing market.

Ključne reči:

Reference

    1. Bardhan, A. Edelstein, R. Kroll, C. (Eds.) (2012) Global Housing Markets: Crises, Policies, and Institutions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
    2. Bardhan, A. Edelstein, R. Kroll, C. (2011) A Comparative Context for U.S. Housing Policy: Housing Markets and the Financial Crisis in Europe, Asia, and Beyond. Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, University of California, Berkeley, [online]. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dd637f5 [Accessed November 17th 2015].
    3. Brueggeman, B.W. Fisher, J.D. (2005) Real Estate, Finance and Investments. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    4. Đorđević, S. (2008) Vlasti u akciji, svet javnih usluga, Belgrade: Čigoja štampa.
    5. Greene, J. (2002) Cities and Privatization. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.
    6. Jakšić, I. (2013) „Programski modeli socijalnog stanovanja i koncept njihove održivosti”. POLIS, No 3: 43-50.
    7. Kahr, J. Thomsett, M.C. (2005) Real Estate Market Valuation and Analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
    8. Milićević, G. (2012) “Ima li optimalnog nivoa odnosa cena stanova i porodičnih prihoda, i do kog nivoa mogu padati cene stanova u Beogradu?”. Faculty of Economics, Belgrade [online]. Available at: http://w3.ekof.bg.ac.rs/nir/tekst/WPbgdPtoI2doc [Accessed November 17th 2015].
    9. Mojović, Đ. Žerjev, B. (2010) Razlozi za uvođenje stambene politike kao izvorne nadležnosti lokalne samouprave, Belgrade: SKGO.
    10. Petronijević, D. (2015) Is Housing Market in Serbia favorable for Citizens?. Belgrade: Čigoja štampa.
    11. Pittini, A. Laino, E. (2011) Housing Europe Review 2012. Brussels: CECODHAS Housing Europe Observatory.
    12. Pollitt, C. Geert, B. (Eds.) (1995) Quality improvement in European Public Services. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    13. Radetić A. Vujačić M (2013) Obstacles to Infrastructure Development. Prokuplje: United Nations Office for Project Services – UNOPS, EU Progress.
    14. Ristić, S. (2013) Stambene reforme u Srbiji. POLIS, No 3: 4-10.
    15. Urošević, B. Šoškić, D. Živković, B. Božović, M. (2011) “The Housing Market in Serbia in the Past Decade”, In: Bardhan, A. Edelstein, R. Kroll, C. (Eds.) Global Housing Markets: Crises, Policies, and Institutions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 247-271.
    16. Wollmann, H. (2008) Reformen in Kommunalpolitik und Verwaltung- England, Sweden, Frankreich und Deutschland im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Socialwissenschaften, Wuestenrot Stiftung.

    Legislation

    1. Law on Mortgage, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Number 115/2005, 60/2015, 63/2015.
    2. Law on State Survey, Cadastre and Registration of Property Rights, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Number 25/2002.
    3. Law on Social Housing, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Number 72/2009.
    4. Law on protection of the financial services’ consumers, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Number 38/2011.

    Institutions whose data basis has been used

    1. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/)
    2. National Corporation for Insuring Housing Loans – NCIHL (http://www.nkosk.rs/content/domex-indeks-cena-nepokretnosti-nacionalne-korporacije-za-osiguranje-stambenih-kredita)
    3. National Bank of Serbia (http://www.nbs.rs/internet/cirilica/80/index.html)
    4. Eurostat (http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=earn_nt_net&lang=en)
    5. Hypostat 2015 (European Mortgage Confederation, 2015, “Hypostat”, European Housing Finance Review, Brussels http://www.hypo.org/PortalDev/Objects/6/Files/Hypostat_2015.pdf)
    6. Data for housing permits (http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/dealing-with-construction-permits).

     

PERIODIKA Serbian Political Thought 2/2015 UDC 332.8+351.778.5(497.11) 109-125
ç