Main topic




The paper illuminates how civil society organisations in Serbia, in the aftermath of the political changes initiated on 5 October 2000, played the essential role in articulating corruption as a vital public issue, raising awareness of the public, and putting pressure on the then governments to include this issue in the political agenda. Our analysis focuses on two planes of civil society organisations activities: 1) research efforts aimed at properly understanding the phenomenology of corruption as the first step towards sound conceptualisation of various anti-corruption measures, and 2) educational initiatives aimed at transferring knowledge and good practice in anti-corruption methodology and policies from post-industrial societies and other post-communist countries. The timeframe of our analysis embraces the period from 5 October 2000 to December 2005, which we see as the initial phase of engaging civil society organisations in anti-corruption policy in Serbia, before the National Anti-Corruption Strategy was adopted. After the changes in October 2000, civil society organizations in Serbia have acted as a significant factor in raising public awareness of corruption as well as in building anti-corruption institutional and normative infrastructure. From campaigns that targeted all stakeholders (citizens, media, business sector, decision makers) aiming at changing their priorities and interests, to participating in the set-up of public policies in the field of rule of law and monitoring the implementation of anti-corruption laws and strategic commitment, civil society organisations that operated within very wide range of activities, successfully influenced both the institutions and the general public. Despite wide range of activities and modest resources, civil society organisations had an impact on actions of the government, public institutions, and the media. The fight against corruption became one of the central issues in the then Serbia’s political debate. Yet the anti-corruption achievements of Serbian civil society organisations in the period 2000–2005, were limited due to a chronic deficit of political, professional, and moral responsibility of all social actors, resulting in “systemic error” of public policies strategic design aimed at combating corruption – the lack of a participatory political culture. The lack of a participatory political culture in citizen action has limited efficiency in achieving development policy goals, and in implementation and monitoring of public policies relevant to curbing corruption. Belief has been established, that citizens do not ask questions and therefore do not have the power to exercise policy influence nor to shape the environment in which they live. As the concept of political community is a special construct based on democracy and human rights, non-inclusiveness as previously outlined here destructively affected society by making deeper asymmetries of all kinds due to disintegrating influence that prevents the final community constitution through democratic institutions.

keywords :


    • Begović, Boris, Boško Mijatović i Dragor Hiber. 2004. Korupcija u pravosuđu. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.
    • Begović, Boris, i Boško Mijatović. 2001. Korupcija u Srbiji. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.
    • Begović, Boris, i Boško Mijatović. 2002. Korupcija na carini. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.
    • Begović, Boris, i Boško Mijatović. 2007. Korupcija u Srbiji pet godina kasnije. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.
    • Begović, Boris, i dr. 2005. Četiri godine tranzicije u Srbiji. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.
    • Beri, Norman. 2007. Uvod u modernu političku teoriju. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
    • Bulatović, Aleksandra i Srđan Korać. 2006. Korupcija i razvoj moderne srpske države. Beograd: Centar za menadžment i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
    • Bulatović, Aleksandra, i Olivera Pavićević. 2021. Crna ekonomija i crno društvo. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju.
    • Dimov, Martin. 2003. “Corruption in Balkan countries.” In Global Corruption Report 2003, eds. Peter Eigen, 285–288. Berlin: Transparency International.
    • Fatić, Aleksandar. 2001. A GRECO Paper: Corruption and Anti-corruption Policy in Serbia. Belgrade: Transparency Serbia.
    • Garton, Jonathan. 2009. The Regulation of Organised Civil Society. Portland: Hart Publishing.
    • Granados, Francisco and Knoke David. 2005. “Organized Interest Groups and Policy Networks.” In The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, civil societies, and globalization, eds. Thomas Janoski, Robert R. Alford, Alexander M. Hicks, Mildred A. Schwartz, 287–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Harison, Ros. 2004. Demokratija. Beograd: Clio.
    • Harris, Jose. 2006. “Development of Civil Society.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, eds. R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman, 131–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Hejvud, Endru. 2004. Politika. Beograd: Klio.
    • Transparenost Srbija. 2003. Inicijative i analize. Poslednji pristup:  07. 02. 2022.
    • Jovanović, Predrag. 2001. Anatomija korupcije. Beograd: Transparentnost Srbija.
    • Jun, Jong. 2006. The Social Construction of Public Administration: Interpretive and Critical Perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    • Kenny, Michael. 2007. “Civil Society.” In Encyclopedia of Governance, eds. Mark Bevir, 91–95. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    • LeRoux, Kelly, and Mary Feeney. 2015. Nonprofit organizations and civil society in the United States. New York and London: Routledge.
    • Margalit, Avišaj. 1998. Pristojno društvo. Beograd: Radio B92.
    • Milivojević, Zdenka, i Stjepan Gredelj. 2002. Uputstvo za upotrebu korupcije. Beograd: Agencija Argument.
    • Nacionalna strategija za borbu protiv korupcije [NSBPK]. 2005. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 109/05.
    • OECD. 2001. Privatizacija i transparentnost. Beograd: Transparentnost Srbija.
    • OECD. 2002. Anti-corruption Measures in South Eastern Europe: Civil Society’s Involvement. Paris:
    • Perić Diligenski, Tijana. 2021. Rasprava o političkoj korupciji. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
    • Perić, Tijana. 2015. „Antikoruptivni kapaciteti Republike Srbije u svetlu međunarodnih integracija.” Srpska politička misao 22 (47): 109–119. doi:10.22182/spm.4712015.7.
    • Poup, Džeremi. 2004. Antikorupcijski priručnik: suprotstavljanje korupciji kroz sistem društvenog integriteta. Beograd: Transparentnost Srbija.
    • Puls – magazin o korupciji. 2003a. Beograd: Centar za menadžment, februar–mart.
    • Puls – magazin o korupciji. 2003b. Beograd: Centar za menadžment, april–maj.
    • Puls – magazin o korupciji. 2004. Beograd: Centar za menadžment, mart–april.
    • Puls – magazin o korupciji. 2005a. Beograd: Centar za menadžment, maj–jun.
    • Puls – magazin o korupciji. 2005b. Beograd: Centar za menadžment, septembar–oktobar.
    • Radovanović, Dobrivoje, i Aleksandra Bulatović. 2005. Korupcija. Beograd: Centar za menadžment i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
    • Riley, Stephen. 1998. “The political-economy of anti-corruption strategies in Africa”. The European Journal of Development Research 10/1, 129–159.
    • Robertson, David. 2004. The Routledge Dictionary of Politics. London and New York: Routledge.
    • Rotberg, Robert. 2020. Anticorruption. Cambridge (MA) and London: MIT Press.
    • Tisné, Martin and Smilov, Daniel. 2004. From the Ground Up: Assessing the Record of Anticorruption Assistance in Southeastern Europe. Budapest: Centre for Policy Studies at Central European University.
    • Transparentnost Srbija. 2003. Sukob javnih i privatnih interesa i slobodan pristup informacijama: analize propisa i istraživanje javnog mnjenja – Srbija 2003. Beograd: Transparentnost Srbija.
    • Transparentnost Srbija. 2005. Sukob javnih i privatnih interesa i slobodan pristup informacijama: analize propisa i istraživanje javnog mnjenja – Srbija 2005. Beograd: Transparentnost Srbija.
    • United Nations Convention Against Corruption [UNCAC]. 2003. UN General Assembly resolution 58/4, 31 October.
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 1/2023 1/2023 УДК 321.011.5::328.185(497.11) 101-123