Main topic

LAW AND POLITICS

THE ORIGIN OF THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION

Abstract

According to the dominant view among scholars of Roman law, a public delict protecting the honour of Romans existed in the Twelve Tables. Allegedly, it was later modified by Sulla’s legal reform at the beginning of the first century BC. The aim of this paper is to challenge these views using the available sources.

The results indicate a lack of sources on criminal protection of honour until the time of Augustus. Then it was limited to persons of higher standing in cases where the success of a private suit was uncertain. Offensive libels were punished by deportation from Rome and by capital punishment in 365 AD at the latest, when they were mentioned in a constitution of Emperors Valentinian I and Valens. The criminal procedure was mentioned for the first time in 478 AD in a constitution of Emperor Zeno. It was allowed only to the illustres, the highest officials and to the members of their families. One could assume that the crime protecting the honour (and body) appeared at the same time, but only for those of the highest social rank.

The applied methods are linguistic, systemic and historical interpretation of the sources.

keywords :

References

    • Hagemann, Matthias. 1998. Iniuria von den XII-Tafeln bis zur Justinianischen Kodifikation. Köln Weimer Wien: Böhlau.
    • Hitzig, Hermann Ferdinand. 1899. Iniuria, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Iniuria im griechischen und römischen Recht. München: Theodor Ackermann.
    • Honoré, Tony. 2002. Ulpian: Pioneer of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Huvelin, Paul. 1903. “La notion de l’ iniuria dans le tres ancient droit romain.” U Melanges Appleton, ur. Charles Louis Appleton, 371‒499. Lyon: A. Rey.
    • Katančević, Andreja. 2019. “Lex Cornelia de iniuriis.” U Pravo u funkciji razvoja društva, ur. Dejan Mirović, 195–208. Kosovska Mitrovica: Univerzitet u Prištini sa privremenim sedištem u Kosovskoj Mitrovici – Pravni fakultet.
    • Kaeveny, Arthur. 2005. Sulla: The Last Republican. New York: Routledge.
    • Kaser, Max. 1949. Das altrömische Ius. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    • Mommsen, Theodor. 1899. Römisches Strafrecht. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
    • Kaser, Max. 1971. Das römische Privatrecht. München: C. H. Beck.
    • Manfredini, Arrigo. 1977. Contributi allo studio dell’”iniuria” in età repubblicana. Milano: Giuffrè.
    • Manfredini, Arrigo. 1979. La diffamazione verbale nel diritto romano I: Eta repulicana. Milano: Giuffrè.
    • Maschke, Richard. 1903. Die Persönlichkeitsrechte des römischen Iniuriensystems. Breslau: Marcus.
    • Plescia, Joseph. 1977. “The Development of ‹iniuria›.” Labeo. 23: 271‒289.
    • Pólay, Elemér. 1986. Iniuria Types in Roman Law. Budapest: Akademiai Kiadó.
    • Schiemann, Gottfried. 2009. “Das carmen malum — Versuch einer Entzauberung.” U Festrschrift für Rolf Knütel zum 70. Geburtstag, ур. Holger Altmeppen, 1059–1066. Heidelberg: Müller.
    • Simon, Dieter. 1965. “Begriff und Tatbestand der „Iniuria” im altrömischen Recht.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 82: 132‒183.
    • Von Lübtow, Ulrich. 1969. “Zum römischen Injurienrecht.” Labeo 15: 131–167.
    • Vujović, Ognjen. 2009. „Iniuria.” Magistarski rad. Univerzitet u Beogradu: Pravni fakultet.

    АНТИЧКИ ИЗВОРИ

    • Cicero. De re publica.
    • Gaius. Institutiones.
    • Iustinianus. Digesta.
    • Iustinianus. Codex.
    • Svetonius. De vita caesarum.
    • Tacitus. Annales.
    • Тheodosius. Codex.
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 3/2020 3/2020 УДК 343.63 327-341
ç