Main topic




The connection between terrorism and organized crime is one of the most prevalent threats to global security since the end of the 20th century, which is most visible in the cooperation between terrorist groups and drug trafficking groups. The main theoretical problem in the research of this relationship is how to explain the difference in the motivation for terrorism, on one hand, and organized crime, on the other. The motivation for terrorism is always ideological, and it is oriented to make some profound political and social change. On the other hand, the motivation for organized crime is material gain it derives from its illegal actions. The question that stems from this conceptual difference is – how do these groups, which are so different in their orientations and goals, manage to make successful cooperation? In this paper, the author will try to offer the answer to that question from the position of rational choice theory. From the rational choice perspective, the actors behave in such a way, which will bring them the most benefits, with as little costs as possible. Therefore, the author finds that the members of terrorist and organized crime groups also make their decisions based on the cost-benefit analysis. To test this hypothesis, the paper is primarily concentrated on deconstructing the concept of ideology and highlighting its main functions in rationalizing and motivating actors to actions. Ideology is a controversial term, its meaning varies from the set of beliefs in a general sense to a false consciousness which goal is to propel the interests of a ruling social class. Our goal here is to shed a light on these functions of ideology and to show that ideology has always been, and stayed, the tool for pursuing the interests of some social group, whether it be a ruling group or a group that represents some political minority. On the other hand, organized crime is seen as an illegal activity conducted by rational actors, to gain material benefits by using illegal methods like violence, the threat of violence, and corruption. After analyzing the concepts of ideology and organized crime, the paper highlights the nature and types of connections between terrorist and organized crime groups in reality. The author finds that both of these groups, seen as rational actors, have many reasons and interests in cooperation, like sharing knowledge and goods, as well as shared trafficking routes.

keywords :


    • Abadinsky, Howard. 2010. Organized crime. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
    • Akers, Ronald L. 1990. “Rational choice, deterrence, and social learning theory in criminology: The path not taken“. J. Crim. L. & Criminology 81(3): 653–676.
    • Albanese, Jay S. 2000. “The Causes of Organized Crime: Do Criminals Organize Around Opportunities for Crime or Do Criminal Opportunities Create New Offenders?“, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 16(4): 409–423.
    • Albini, Joseph L. 1971. The American Mafia: Genesis of a legend. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    • Albini, Joseph L., and Jeffrey S. McIllwain. 2012. Deconstructing organized crime: an historical and theoretical study. London: McFarland & Company, Inc.
    • Clarke, Ronald V. G., and Marcus Felson, eds. 1993. Routine activity and rational choice Vol. 5. New Brunswick: Transaction publishers.
    • Cornish, Derek B., and Ronald V. G. Clarke, eds. 2014. The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
    • Dishman, Chris. 2001. “Terrorism, Crime, and Transformation“. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 24(1): 43–58.
    • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
    • Finckenauer, James O. 2007. Mafia and organized crime: a beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
    • Finckenauer, James O. 2005. “Problems of Definition: What is Organized Crime?” Trends in Organized Crime 8(3): 63–83.
    • Gerring, John. 1997. “Ideology: A Definitional Analysis”, Political Research Quarterly 50(4): 957-994
    • Hagan, Frank E. 2006. “Organized crime” and “organized crime”: Indeterminate problems of definition”. Trends in Organized Crime 9: 127–137.
    • Herrnstein, Richard J. 1990. “Rational choice theory: Necessary but not sufficient“. American Psychologist 45(3): 356-367.
    • Ignjatović, Đorđe, and Milan Škulić. 2010. Organizovani kriminalitet. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
    • Jost, John T, Christopher M. Federico, and Jaime L. Napier. 2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities“. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 307–337.
    • Jost, John T, and David M. Amodio. 2011. “Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence“. Motivation and Emotion 36(1): 55–64.
    • Kennedy, Emmet. 1979. “Ideology” from Destutt De Tracy to Marx”. Journal of the History of Ideas 40(3): 353–368.
    • Makarenko, Tamara. 2004. “The Crime-Terror Continuum: Tracing the Interplay between Transnational Organised Crime and Terrorism“. Global Crime 6: 129–145
    • Makarenko, Tamara. 2012. “Europe’s Crime-Terror Nexus: Links between terrorists and organized crime groups in the European Union“. Study for the LIBEE committee. Brussels: Europan Parliament.
    • Minar, D. M. 1961. “Ideology and Political Behavior“. Midwest Journal of Political Science 5(4): 317–331.
    • Mullins, Willard A. 1972. “On The Concept of Ideology in Political Science“. The American Political Science Review 66(2): 498–510.
    • Parekh, Bhikhu. 2015. Marx’s Theory of Ideology (RLE Marxism). London: Routledge.
    • Pines, Christopher L. 1997. Ideology and false consciousness: Marx and his historical progenitors. New York: SUNY Press.
    • Piquero, Alex R., and Stephen G. Tibbets, eds. 2001. Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges. New York: Routledge.
    • Pratt, Travis C. 2008. “Rational choice theory, crime control policy, and criminological relevance“. Criminology & Public Policy 7(1): 43–52.
    • Ricolfi, Luca. 2006. “Palestinians, 1981–2003“. In Making Sense of Suicide Missions, Diego Gambetta, ed., 77-130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Sanderson, Thomas M. 2004. “Transnational Terror and Organized Crime: Blurring the Lines“. SAIS Review 24(1): 49–61.
    • Sari, Ismail. 2015. “The nexus between terrorism and organized crime; growing threat?“ Journal of the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes 6: 463–503
    • Schmid, Alex P. 2005. “Links between Terrorism and Drug Trafficking: A Case of „Narco-terrorism“?“ International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security 8: 27
    • Sellin, Thorsten. 1963. “Organized Crime: A Business Enterprise”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 347(1): 12–19.
    • Shelley, Louise I., and John T. Picarelli. 2005. “Methods and motives: Exploring links between transnational organized crime and international terrorism“. Trends in Organized Crime 9: 52–67.
    • Shvarts, Alexander. 2001. “The Russian Mafia: Do Rational Choice Models Apply?“ Michigan Sociological Review, 15: 29–63.
    • Simeunović, Dragan. 2009a. Uvod u političku teoriju. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
    • Simeunović, Dragan. 2009b. Terorizam. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
    • Van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. “Ideology and discourse analysis“. Journal of political ideologies 11(2): 115–140.
    • Warren, Mark. 1990. “Ideology and the Self“. Theory and Society 19(5): 599–634.
PERIODICS Political Review 1/2021 1/2021 УДК 343.9.02:316.75 145-164