Choose language:
  • Home page
  • Articles
  • Securitizing Migration in the European Union: from Openness to Ban-Opticon
Main topic

spt2/2014

Securitizing Migration in the European Union: from Openness to Ban-Opticon

Luka Glušac

Abstract

This paper offers a view on why and how migrations have been perceived as a security threat in the European Union. The underlining question posed is how the ambition of EU nation-states to control the entry and movement of people can be reconciled with liberal standards promoting human rights, open borders and humanitarian values. The author uses the theory of securitization, Didier Bigo’s concept of Ban-opticon and human security concept as theoretical grounds, while the normative and political discourse analyses are utilized to show the EU practice. The intention is to show that while the number of migrants has not been significantly change in the last years, the public perception is different, especially due to the Arab Spring. The EU, which integration and long-time economic success would not be possible without constant influx of the immigrants, in the recent years developed people unfriendly migration control system. I argue that such system came as a result of several factors, most notably societal securitization. As the Arab turmoil coincides with the post 9/11 changes in security policies, economic crisis and the rise of far right parties in several EU Member States, the migration issue has been increasingly securitized. EU’s legal norms and methods follow such societal securitization. Tight border control (including increased surveillance), usage of buffer zones and externalization of border control are crucial EU methods of dealing with migration. The author concludes that while migrations have a clear security dimension, they are best addressed through rights-based policies.

keywords :

References

    1. Amnesty International. (2014) “The Human Cost of Fortress Europe: Human Rights Violations Against Migrants and Refugees at Europe’s Borders“. London: Amnesty International.
    2. Aubarell, G., Zapata-Barrero, R. & Aragall, X. (2009) “Directions of National Immigration Policies: The Development of the External Dimension and its Relationship with the Euro-Mediterranean Process”. Euromesco Paper, 79.
    3. Benam, Ç.H. (2011) “Emergence of a `Big Brother` in Europe: Border Control and Securitization of Migration“. Insight Turkey, 13(3): pp. 191-207.
    4. Bigo, D. (2002) “Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease”. Alternatives, 27: pp. 63-92.
    5. Bigo, D. (2005) “Frontier Controls in the European Union: Who is in Control?”. In Bigo, D. and Guild, E. (eds.) Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 49-99.
    6. Boswell, C. (2007) “Migration Control in Europe After 9/11: Explaining the Absence of Securitization“. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3): pp. 589–610.
    7. Boswell, C. (2010) “Justice and Home Affairs”. In Egan, M.P., Nugent, N. & Paterson, W.E. (eds.) Research Agendas in EU Studies: Stalking the Elephant. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 278-297.
    8. Brochmann, G. (1999) “Controlling immigration in Europe”. In Brochmann, G. and & Hammar, T. (eds.) Mechanisms of Immigration Control: A Comparative Analysis of European Regulation Policies. Oxford: Berg.
    9. Buzan, B., Ole Wæver, О. & de Wilde, Ј. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    10. Carrera, S., Parkin, J. & den Hertog, J. (2013) “EU Migration Policy After the Arab Spring: The Pitfalls of Home Affairs Diplomacy”, Policy Paper No. 74. Notre Europe: Jacques Delors Institute.
    11. Chandler, D. (2008) “Human Security: The Dog That Didn’t Bark”. Security Dialogue, 39(4): pp. 427-439.
    12. European Commission. (2011) “The Global Approach to Migration and Mobility”, COM(2011) 743 final.
    13. European Council. (1999) “Presidency Conclusions (Tampere Agenda)”, Tampere: European Council, 15-16 October.
    14. European Council. (2004) “Presidency Conclusions (The Hague Programme)”, The Hague: European Council, 4-5 November.
    15. European Council. (2010) “The Stockholm Programme — An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens”, 2010/C 115/01.
    16. European Union (2003) “European Security Strategy: A Secure Europe in a Better World”. Brussels: EU.
    17. European Union (2010) “EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five Steps towards a More Secure Europe” (IIS), COM(2010) 673 final.
    18. Fargues, P. and Fandrich,C. (2012) “Migration after the Arab Spring”, Migration Policy Centre Research Report No. 9. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies: European University Institute.
    19. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2006) “Filtering Out the Risky Migrant, Migration Control, Risk Theory and the EU”. AMID Working Paper Series 52.
    20. (2010) 17 October, [online]. Avaialble at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed [Accessed 15 August 2014].
    21. Herd, G. P. and Lofgren, J. (2001) “Societal Security, the Baltic States, and EU Integration”. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(3): pp. 273–296.
    22. Human Rights Watch (2011) “The EU’s Dirty Hands: Frontex Involvement in Ill-Treatment of Migrant Detainees in Greece“. New York: Human Rights Watch.
    23. Huysmans, J. (1995) “Migrants as a Security Problem: Dangers of ‘Securitizing’ Societal Issues“. In: Miles, R. and Thranhardt, D (eds) Migration and European Security: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion. London: Pinter. pp. 53-12.
    24. Huysmans, J. (2000) “The European Union and the Securitization of Migration”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (5): pp. 751-77.
    25. Huysmans, J. (2006) The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. New York: Routledge.
    26. International Organization for Migration (IOMa). Facts and Figures, [online]. Avaialble at: http://www.iom.int/files/live/sites/iom/files/infographics/iom_infographics.jpg [Accessed 15 August 2014].
    27. International Organization for Migration (IOMb). (2005) “World Migration 2005: Costs and Benefits of International Migration”, World Migration Report Series, [online]. Avaialble at: http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/cache/bypass/pid/1674?entryId=932&srcId=933&grpsrc=yes&publicationEntriesGroup_filter=World%20Migration%20Reports [Accessed 15 August 2014].
    28. Jutila, M. (2006) “Desecuritizing Minority Rights: Against Determinism”. Security Dialogue, 37(2): pp. 167-185.
    29. Kelstrup, M. (1995) “Societal Aspects of European Security“. In Hansen, B (ed.) European Security 2000. Copenhagen: Political Studies Press. pp. 172-197.
    30. Lavenex, S. (2010) “Justice and Home Affairs”. In: Wallace, H., Wallace, W & Pollack, M.A. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 457-482.
    31. Lipovac, M. and Glušac, L. (2011) “Perspektive koncepta ljudske bezbednosti” (Perspectives of the Human Security Concept). Kultura polisa, 16: pp. 57-76.
    32. Le Voy, M., Verbruggen, N. & Wets, J. (eds). (2004) Undocumented Migrant Workers in Europe. Brussels: PICUM.
    33. Lebbe, C. (2011) “The Ban-Opticon in the Schengen: – The Ambivalent Meaning of Mobility”. Open, 21.
    34. Migration in the EU Infographics. (2014). European Union, [online]. Avaialble at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/docs/infographics/immigration/migration-in-eu-infographic_en.pdf [Accessed 15 August 2014].
    35. Neal, A.W. (2009) “Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2): pp. 333–356.
    36. Paris, R. (2001) “Human Security – Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?”. International Security, 26(2): pp. 87-102.
    37. Roe, P. (2005) Ethnic Violence and the Societal Security Dilemma. New York: Routledge.
    38. Rotman, M. (2012) “Playing Their Cards Early: Lessons for Schengen from the ‘Arab Spring’”. In Berglund, S., McCarthy, H & Patyna, A (eds.) Migration, Human Rights and Security in Europe. MRU Student Conference Proceedings. London: University College London. pp. 26-34.
    39. Rystad, G. (1992) “Immigration History and the Future of International Migration”. International Migration Review, 26(4): pp. 1168-1199.
    40. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal C 326.
    41. Thakur, R. (2003) Globalization, Migration and Human Security: Challenges in Northern Asia. Tokyo Japan: United Nations University.
    42. The Commission for Human Security (CHS). (2003) “Human Security Now”, New York: CHS.
    43. European Commission. (2014) “The Final Implementation Report of the EU Internal Security Strategy 2010-2014”. COM(2014) 365 final.
    44. UNGA – United Nations General Assembly (2004) “Report on the Human Rights of Migrants Submitted by the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights”, Geneva: UN.
    45. Valverde, M. (2004) “Targeted Governance and the Problem of Desire”. In: Ericson, R.V.and Doyle, A (eds.) Risk and Morality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 438-458.
    46. Van Munster, R. (2005) “Migrants as a Risk Class? The Securitisation and Desecuritisation of Immigration in the EU”, PhD Dissertation. Odense: Department of Political Science, University of Southern Denmark. In Van Muster, R. (2005) Reconfiguring Authority: Neo-Liberal Governmentality, Security and Immigration Control in the EU, [online]. Avaialble at: http://www.sam.sdu.dk/politics/nisa/papers/rv_munster.doc[Accessed 15 August 2014].
    47. Vietti, F. and Scribner,T. (2013) “Human Insecurity: Understanding International Migration from a Human Security Perspective”. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 1(1): pp. 17-31.

     

PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 2/2014eng 2/2014 UDC 314.74+341.43(4-672EU) 159-177
https://doi.org/10.22182/spt.1022014.8
Back to Issue Serbian Political Thought - 2/2014
ç