Main topic

CHALLENGES OF SOCIAL PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AS A PARTICULAR SENSITIVE GROUP OF THE POPULATION

SATISFACTION OF VOLUNTEERS WITH PSYCHODRAMA GROUPS “HELPING THE HELPERS”

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present the results of the evaluation of the volunteer satisfaction to the psychodrama groups ” Helping the Helpers ” (HH) in the program “Big brother, big sister” (BBBS). The BBBS program is a program of external support for children in which a volunteer, through a permanent relationship and interaction, provides the child with psychosocial support for a period of 20 months. HH represent a group of psychosocial support activities for volunteers in the SBSS program. Psychodrama meetings take place on average once every two months for a period of 2.5 hours, using group method. HH is based on these theories and perspectives: the prevention of vicarious trauma and combustion syndrome, the perspective of social work in establishing a positive relationship with the client, sensory binding theory, perspectives of strength, theory of mentoring work, anti-perceiving and anti-discrimination perspectives. User satisfaction data HH and certain aspects of HH were collected based on the response of volunteers in the Final Report. The evaluation included 33 volunteers of the BBBS program. On a scale from 1 to 10, they rated the service with an average score of 9.26 for all four cycles. Individually observing each cycle: the first cycle with 9.8, the second with 9.7, third cycle with 7.9, fourth with 9.3. The most important for volunteers is Group Support and Experience Sharing. The most suggestions were for more frequent groups, more regular attendance of volunteers and better compatibility termins of groups with volunteer obligations.

keywords :

References

    • Ајдуковић, Марина и Цајверт Лиља, Супервизија у психосоцијалном раду, Друштво за психолошку помоћ, Загреб, 2014, стр. 14-24, 359-376.
    • Борјанић, Емина, “Викаријанска трауматизација и професионалци у систему социјалне заштите деце и младих”, Социјална политика, 2016, 1/2016., год. 51, стр.77-98.
    • Бранковић, Ива, Шарац, Нада, Живанић, Светлана, Супервизија у центру за социјални рад – Приручник за супервизоре, Завод за социјалну и дјечју заштиту, Подгорица, 2017.
    • Бургунд, Анита, “Синдрома изгарања у помажућим професијама”, Социјална мисао, 2010, број 2, стр.111-120.
    • Вулевић, Гордана, Помоћ помагачима, Save The Children UK, Београд, 2002.
    • Ђурић, Зоран, Вељковић, Јасна и Томић, Миомир, Psychodrama – A Beginner’s Guide, Jessica Kinsley Publishers, London and Philadelphia, 2006.
    • Жегарац, Невенка, Од проблема до прилика у вођењу случаја. Приручник за практичаре, Центар за истраживања у социјалној политици и социјалном раду, Факултет политичких наука, Београд, 2016, стр.193-194.
    • Јалом, Ирвин и Лешћ, Молин (2013). Теорија и пракса групне психотерапије. Психополис институте, Нови Сад.
    • Gal, Reuven, “Colleagues in distress: `helping the helpers’”, International Review of Psychiatry, 1998, 10, pp.234-238.
    • Grossman, J.B., & Tierney, J.P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review22, 403-426.
    • Nuttman-Schwartz, Orit, Dekel, Rachel. Training Students for Shared Traumatic Reality. Social work, Volume 53, Number 3, July 2008, pp 279-281.
    • Payne, Malcolm, Савремена теорија социјалног рада. Филозофски факултет Универзитета у Бањалуци, 2001, стр.183-203.
    • Половина, Нада, “Осећајно везивање: теорија, истраживања, пракса”, Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, Београд, 2005.
    • Ruch, Gillian, Ward, Adrian and Turney, Danielle, “Relationship-Based Social Work: Getting to the Heart of Practice”, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2010.
    • Ruch, Gillian, “Where Have All the Feelings Gone? Developing Reflective and Relationship-Based Management in Child-Care Social Work, British Journal of Social Work, 2012, vol. 42, pp.1315-1332.
    • Tierney, J.P., Grossman, J.B., & Resch, N.L. (1995). Making a difference: An impact study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
PERIODICS Social policy 2/2020 2/2020 УДК 364.4-058.862(497.11) 95-115
ç