Main topic

ESSAYS AND STUDIES

PLATFORM WORK AND NEW FORMS OF WORK IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

Abstract

Digitalization is changing labour market relations by calling into question the concept of a classic employment relationship that relies heavily on a bilateral employment contract of indefinite duration. Also, on the other hand, digitalization leads to a significant polarization in the labour market between highly qualified professionals, for whose work there is a growing need, and low-skilled workers, who face increasing obstacles when looking for employment.

Platform work is an atypical, new form of work, made possible by digital technology and characterized by, most often, a tripartite legal relationship between the digital platform, the platform worker and the client. In this paper we have identified two general types of platforms. First one, which are serving as tool for matching jobseekers with clients, and the second one which are not only matching, but also managing the working process. Anyway, digital platforms should stop charging any fees or costs for job finding services, unless those fees or costs have been approved by a competent authority. This principle has served as a central tenet during the development of regulations governing private employment services. In this paper, we emphasized that digital labour platforms often disregard this principle, by offering their users the possibility of increasing their visibility or ensuring better functionality of the platform in exchange for monetary payments.

The paper analyzes the new forms of employment, that came because of social, economic, political and technological changes around the globe. Many of these are quite different from traditional work and characterized by unconventional work patterns. At this moment, none of the mentioned new forms of employment is directly regulated by domestic labor legislation, so there is a lot of room for their regulation in order to make them more attractive for employers and employees.

Finally, there are many regulatory challenges related to platform work on both, national and international level. The main issue is the question of classification of those workers, more precisely, are they employees or self-employed. Related to that, there is also a problem with digital platform algorithms, which are not always transparent as they should be. The scope od employment protection still largely depends on the legal definition of an employee. Yet, with the emergence of the platform work and other forms of work, the employment relation status must be evaluated with regard to the current social and economic situation. In any case, it is imperative that all workers, despite their employments status, are covered by fundamental international labour standards.

keywords :

References

    • Adams, Abi, Mark Freedland and Jeremias Prassl. 2015. The “Zero-Hours Contract”: Regulating Casual Work, or Legitimating Precarity? Labour law research Network.
    • Aneesh, Aneesh. 2009. “Global Labour: Algocratic modes of organization.” Sociological theory, 27(4): 347-370. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352.x.
    • Anđelković, Branka, Tanja Jakobi, Maja Kovač i Slobodan Golušin. 2020. Pakleni vozači – ima li dostojanstvenog rada na digitalnim platformama za dostavu i prevoz putnika u Srbiji. Beograd: Centar za istraživanje javnih politika.
    • Berg, Janine. 2016. “Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers.” ILO: Conditions of Work and employment Series No. 74. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_protect/—protrav/—travail/documents/publication/wcms_479693.pdf.
    • Bjelinski Radić. 2018. „Izazovi radnog i socijalnog prava u svjetlu digitalizacije rada.” Zagrebačka pravna revija, 7 (3): 309-331.
    • Božičić, Darko. 2020. „Digitalne platforme i njihov uticaj na odnose povodom digitalnog rada.” Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 54 (1): 433-456. doi: 10.5937/zrpfns54-25087.
    • Branković, Srbobran. 2017. „Veštačka inteligencija i društvo.” Srpska politička misao, 56 (2): 13-32. doi.org/10.22182/spm.5622017.1.
    • Bruoghton, Andrea, Rosie, Gloster, Rosa Marvell, Martha Green, Jamal Langley and Alex Martin. 2018. “The experiances of individuals in the gig economy HM Government.” Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK.   The_characteristics_of_those_in_the_gig_economy.pdf (publishing.service.gov.uk).
    • Butković, Hrvoje. 2019. Vodič za radnike u digitalnoj ekonomiji Hrvatske. Zagreb: Institut za međunarodne odnose.
    • Casale, Guissepe. 2011. The Employment Relationship: A Comparative Overview. ILO: Hurt Publishing.
    • Davidov, Guy, Mark Freedland and Nicola Kountouris. 2015. “The Subjects of Labour Law:
    • ‘Employees’ and Other ‘Workers’.” In Research Handbook in Comparative Labour Law, eds.  Finkin Matthew and Greg Mundlak. London: Edward Elgar.
    • Davies, Paul and Mark Freedland. 1983. Kahn-Freund’s Labour and the Law. London:  Stevens.
    • De Groen, Willem Pieter, Zachary Kilhoffer, Karolien Lenaerts and Irene Mandl. 2018. Employment and Working Conditions of Selected Types of Platform Work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    • De Stefano, Valerio. 2015. “The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, No. 2682602. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602.
    • De Stefano, Valerio. 2016. “Introduction: Crowdsourcing, the Gig-Economy and the Law.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37 (3): 1–10. https://ssrn.com/abstra- ct=2767383.
    • Eurofund. 2015. New Forms of Employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/937385.
    • Eurofund. 2018. Overview of new forms of employment – 2018 update. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/customised-report/2018/overview-of-new-forms-of-employment-2018-update.
    • Florisson, Rebacca and Irene Mandle. 2018. “Platform work: Types and implications for work and employment.” Literature review. Platform work: Types and implications for work and employment – Literature review (bollettinoadapt.it).
    • Grgurev, Ivana i Ivana Vukorepa. 2018. “Flexible and New Forms of Employment in Croatia and their Pension Entitlement Aspects.” In Transnational, European, and National Labour Relations, eds. Sander, Gerald, Vesna, Tomljenovic i Nada Bodiroga-Vukobrat, 241-262. Springer Verlag.
    • Ivanova, Mirela, Joanna, Bronowicka, Eva Kocher and Anne Degner Drawing. 2018. “The App as a Boss? Control and Autonomy in Application-Based Management.” Viadrina Center Borders in Motion, doi: 10.11584.
    • Kittur, Aniket, Jeffrey Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matthew Lease and John Horton. 2013. “The Future of Crowd work.” CSCW ’13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1301-1318. DOI:10.1145/2441776.2441923.
    • Kovačević, Ljubinka. 2013. Pravna subordinacija u radnom odnosu i njene granice. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
    • International Labour Organization. 2013. “Regulating the employment relationship in Europe: A guide to Recommendation No. 198.” International Labour Organization. https://ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312535.
    • Jašarević, Senad. 2016. „Uticaj digitalizacije na radne odnose.” Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 50 (4): 1103-1117.  doi: 10.5937/zrpfns50-12356.
    • Mandle Irene. 2015. “New Forms of Employment Offer Both Benefits and Risks.” Social Europe. https://socialeurope.eu/new-forms-of-employment-offer-both-benefits-and-risks.
    • Marica, Mihaela-Emilia. 2020. Employee sharing: a new type of employment, opportune in a globalized context, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Business Excellence, DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2020-0111.
    • Pesole, Annarosa and Urzi Brancati, 2018. “Platform Workers in Europe.” Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. doi:10.2760/742789.
    • Prassl, Jerremias and Martin Risak. 2016. “Uber, TaskRabbit & Co: Platforms as Employers? Rethinking the legal analysis of Crowdwork.  Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal, Forthcoming Oxford Legal Studies, No. 8/2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2733003.
    • Ray, Jean-Emmanuel. 2015. “Impacts of Digitalisation on the regulation of Working Conditions.” European Labour Law Network – 8th Annual legal seminar, Digitalisation and Labour Law. Hague.
    • Rončević, Danilo and Aleksandar Antić. 2016. “Ugovor bez određenog radnog vremena (zero hour contract).” Časopis za radno pravo i socijalno osiguranje Srbije XX (1): 229-244.
    • Strowel, Alain and Wouter Vergote. 2019. “Digital platforms: to regulate or not to regulate?” In The Platform Economy. Unraveling the Legal Status of Online Intermediairies, ed. Bram Devolder. Cambridge: Intersentia.
    • Tyrell, Jeffrey. 2014. Interim management: an enquiry into praxis. DBA, Nottingham Trent University.  http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/244.
    • Urdarević, Bojan i Zoran Radulović. 2012. „Globalizacija i koncept socijalnih prava.” Srpska politička misao, 35 (1): 169-186. doi.org/10.22182/spm.3512012.9.
    • Vacotto, Beatriz. 2013. “Precarious work and the exercise of freedom of association and collective bargaining: Current ILO jurisprudence.” International Journal of Labour 5 (1): 17–131.
    • Vukorepa, Ivana. 2018. “Rethinking Labour Law in the Context of 4th Industrial” Revolution Inter- national conference “Novelties in Labour Law”. Zagreb (Croatia).
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 2/2021 2/2021 УДК 331.1:004.7]:349.2 153-175
ç