Main topic

ESSEYS AND STUDIES

PERCEPTION OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF HOMELESS IN SERBIA

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify (using focus groups) what are the aspects of the quality of life of homeless, as well as which aspects of life are most important to them. Content analysis was used to analyze the respondents’ answers. The sample consists of 43 respondents aged 25 to 65 years. The following aspects of quality of life have been identified: health and health care, living conditions, financial situation, employment opportunities, social relations, recreational activities and hobbies, mental well-being. This aspects of quality of life reflect the specific context and life experiences of people who live on the streets and do not have a permanent place of residence, and given that it is necessary to form or adapt existing instruments that will estimate the effects of social and health policy on the quality of life of the homeless. In this way, after research with the aim to estimate the success of social protection measures which consider welfare of homeless, we will know the results of the applied measures. Also, it is necessary to change health and social policy, ie the triage of the homeless, and above all to offer help and support to those who will respond with active engagement in order to help themselves.

keywords :

References

    • Бобић, Мирјана. 2014. Бескућници. Београд: Републички завод за статистику http://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2014/Pdf/G20144011.pdf.
    • Пенезић, Звјездан. 2006. ,,Задовољство животом у адолесцентној и одраслој доби”. Друштвена истраживања 15 (4-5): 643-669.
    • Acton, Gayle. 1994. “Well-being as a concept for theory, practice, and research”. The Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis for Nursing, 11: 1-26
    • De Maeyer, Jessica, Vanderplasschen, Wouter, and Broekaert, Eric. 2009. “Exploratory study on drug users’ perspectives on quality of life: More than health-related quality of life?” Social Indicators Research, 90: 107–126.
    • Diener, Ed and Lucas, Richard. 1999. “Personality and subjective well-being”. In The foundations of hedonic psychology, eds. D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz, (str. 213-229). New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.
    • Diener, Ed. 2006. “Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being”. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1: 151-157.
    • Irestig, Robert, Burstrom, Kristina, Wessel, Maja, and Lynoe, Niels. 2010. “How are homeless people treated in the healthcare system and other societal institutions? Study of their experiences and trust.” Scand J Public Health, 38(3): 225–231. doi: 10.1177/1403494809357102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • Kushel, Margot, Gupta, Reena, Gee, Lauren, and Haas, Jennifer. 2005. “Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans.” J Gen Intern Med, 21(1): 71–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00278.xPubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • Lehman, Anthony. 1988. “A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill”. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11. doi: 51–62. 10.1016/0149-7189(88)90033-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Martins, Dianne Cocozza. 2008. “Experiences of homeless people in the health care delivery system: a descriptive phenomenological study”. Public Health Nurs, 25(5): 420–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2008.00726.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • Myres, David, and Diener, Ed .1995. “Who is happy?” Psychological science, 6: 10-19.
    • Nickasch, Bonnie and Marnocha, Suzanne. 2009. “Healthcare experiences of the homeless.” J Am Acad Nurse Pract, 21(1): 39–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00371.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
    • Pavot, William i Diener, Ed.1993. “The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being.” Social Indicators Research, 28: 1-20.
    • Power, Mick, Kuyken, Willem.1998. “World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties”. Social Science & Medicine, 46 (12): 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    • Schalock, Robert, Brown, Roy, Brown, Ivan, Cummins, Robert, Felce, David, Matikka, Leena, Kenneth, Keith, and Parmenter, Trevor. 2002. “Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts”. Mental Retardation, 40: 457–470.
    • Seligman, Martin. 2002. “Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy”. Handbook of positive psychology, 3-9. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Zuvekas, Samuel, and Hill, Steven. 2000. “Income and employment among homeless people: the role of mental health, health and substance abuse”. J Ment Health Policy Econ, 3(3): 153–163. 10.1002/mhp.94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
PERIODICS Political Review 4/2020 4/2020 УДК 316.728-057.66(497.11) 145-170
ç