FORCED PREGNANCY IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW

Aleksa Škundrić

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to examine the crime of forced pregnancy within the framework of the International Criminal Law (ICL). The author notes that acts of sexual violence, including forced pregnancy, have long been neglected in the system of international criminal justice. The crime of forced pregnancy has particularly been one of the most controversial issues during the negotiations regarding the text of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Delegations from several states that prohibit abortion were concerned that the adoption of the crime will expose their nationals to the criminal prosecution for forced pregnancy. A solution was a compromise which moved the crime of forced pregnancy away from the original concept of its proponents – an emphasis of the crime, as it stands in the Rome Statute, is not on the denial of the abortion for women which have been forcibly made pregnant, but rather on the (physical) confinement of such women. Also, the result is a definition that is too complex to be of significant practical value, a demonstration of which is the fact that the ICC has just recently made its first judgement regarding the crime of forced pregnancy, even though this crime has been in the Rome Statute for more than twenty years. Having that in mind, the author argues that the crime of forced pregnancy is a classic example of the “overextension” of the ICL. Namely, the ICC should be responsible for prosecuting only the most serious international crimes which are of concern for the international community. Clearly, as it has been demonstrated in the Rome Conference, various states have very different opinions on this issue. Besides these topics, the author has also pointed out that the crime of forced pregnancy, within a framework of crimes against humanity and war crimes, is a distinct crime in relation to the crime of genocide. The main difference between those two crimes is in their material element.

References

Бановић Јована, „Тачке спајања и раздвајања српског и међународног кривичног права на примеру чл. 30 Римског статута“, у зборнику: Зборник радова са међународне научне конференције „Раскршћа међународног кривичног и кривичног права – реформа правосудних закона Републике Србије“ (приредили Милан Шкулић, Ивана Миљуш, Алекса Шкундрић), Удружење за међународно кривично право и Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду, Београд, 2023, 127–135;

Вуковић Игор, Кривично право: општи део, Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду, Београд, 2021;

Делић Наташа, Кривично право: посебни део, Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду, Београд, 2021;

Ристивојевић Бранислав, Међународна кривична дела – Део I, Правни факултет Универзитета у Новом Саду, Нови Сад, 2014;

Стојановић Зоран и Перић Обрад, Кривично право: посебни део, Правна књига, Београд, 2006;

Шкулић Милан, Кривична дела против полне слободе, Службени гласник, Београд, 2019;

Шкулић Милан, Међународно кривично право, Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду, Београд, 2020;

Шкундрић Алекса, „Сексуални деликти у оружаним сукобима“, Зборник студентских радова Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду, Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду, Београд, 2021, 77–94;

Шурлан Тијана, Злочин против човечности у међународном кривичном праву, Службени гласник, Београд, 2011;

van Acker Frank, “Uganda and the Lord’s Resistance Army: The New Order No One Ordered”, African Affairs, No. 12/2004, 335–357;

Babić Miloš, Međunarodno krivično pravo, Pravni fakultet u Banjoj Luci, Banja Luka, 2011;

Baird Grey Rosemary Anna, Prosecuting sexual and gender crimes in the International Criminal Court – Historical legacies and new opportunities, PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, 2015;

Bedont Barbara and Hall-Martinez Katherine, “Ending Impunity for Gender Crimes under International Criminal Court”, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, No. 1/1999, 65–85;

Buehler Carmela, “War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide – The Crime of Forced Pregnancy in the Nascent System of Supranational Criminal Law”, Nemesis, No. 5/2002, 158–167;

Drake Alyson M., “Aimed at Protecting Ethnic Groups or Women? A Look at Forced Pregnancy under the Rome Statute”, William & Marry Journal of Women and the Law, No. 3/2012, 595–623;

Eng Jessie Soh Sie, „Forced Pregnancy: Codification in the Rome Statute and its Prospect as Implicit Genocide“, New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, No. 2/2006, 311–338;

Grey Rosemary, “The ICC’s First ‘Forced Pregnancy’ Case in Historical Perspective”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, No. 5/2017, 905–930;

Markovic Milan, „Vessels of Reproduction: Forced Pregnancy and the ICC“, Michigan State Journal of International Law, No. 2/2007, 439–458;

Shaw Malcolm, International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003;

Sjöholm Maria, “Article 7 (1) (g): Crimes against humanity, Forced Pregnancy”, Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court (ed. Mark Klamberg), Brussels, 2017, 53–54;

Stojanović Zoran, „O pojmu pretnje u krivičnom pravu“, NBP – Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, br. 2/2013, 1–16;

Stojanović Zoran, Krivično pravo: opšti deo, Pravna knjiga, Beograd, 2017;

Tétrault – Provencher Julia, “Replicating the Definition of ‘Forced Pregnancy’ from the Rome Statute in a Future Convention on Crimes Against Humanity: A Tough Pill to Swallow”, Hastings Journal on Gender and Law, No. 2/2022, 105–150;

ПРАВНИ ИЗВОРИ

Елементи кривичних дела (Elements of Crimes);

Законик о кривичном поступку – ЗКП, Службеник гласник РС, бр. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013, 55/2014, 35/2019, 27/2021 – одлука УС и 62/2021 – одлука УС;

Кривични законик – КЗ, Службени гласник РС, бр. 85/2005, 88/2005 – испр., 107/2005 – испр., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016 и 35/2019;

Кривични законик Савезне Републике Немачке (StGB), Немачка фондација за међународну правну сарадњу (IRZ), Нови Сад, 2022;

Римски статут Међународног кривичног суда (Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court);

СУДСКА ПРАКСА

ICJ Reports, Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgement of 26 February 2007;

The Prosecutor v Akayesu, Judgment, 2 September 1998, ICTR-96-4-T;

The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen, Trial Judgement, 4 February 2021, ICC-02/04-01/15;