ESPECIALLY VULNERABLE POPULATION GROUPS FACING DISCRIMINATION, INJUSTICE AND INEQUALITY
FOOD BANKS – WELFARE STATE FAILURE OR CIVIL SOCIETY SECTOR CHARITY?
Hunger and food insecurity, despite global initiatives and national welfare actions, remains the key social problem in the 21st century. Due to the economic and migrant crisis and considering that poverty and unemployment represent the greatest risks to hunger, insecure and poor nutrition, satisfying basic human needs for food has involved multiple welfare sectors in Europe in the last decade. Тhe welfare state has traditionally provided support to the poor, with the non-governmental sector emerging as a new provider of benefits. Since establishment of food banks a few decades earlier, the scientists and experts have been considering the dilemma of their impact on the state’s responsibility towards the poor.
Therefore, the goals of the paper are to describe and analyze the characteristics of food banks in the processes of managing and distributing food surpluses, as well as to analyze the positive and negative implications of such redistribution of food surpluses to the poor. Compared to traditional ways of providing support in food such as soup kitchens, food banks operate based on the surplus of food from different sectors of production and trade, performing intermediary role between donors and beneficiaries. Using this position in the system of food recovery process and their logistical capabilities, the aim of these non-profit organizations is to redistribute food to low-income households. Despite humanistic-oriented activities, conducted content analysis in this paper points to conflicting viewpoints on the food banks engagement up to the present.
Food bank opponents have several reasons for objection. The first group can be classified as ideological and value dilemma of state vs. non-state actors providing basic needs. The authors believe that neoliberal discourse has made changes to state support systems for the poor, emphasizing the individual responsibility of the poor, thereby legitimizing the withdrawal of the government intervention. Also, various studies have argued stigmatization and deepening of social exclusion for beneficiaries of this in-kind support. Аdvocates, on the other hand, point to intersecting utilities of redistribution process. Political-economic arguments are based on the fact that redistribution of surplus food is beneficial for both parties ie. win-win situation. Additionally, environmental sustainability and the development of social solidarity are important contributions of food banks to the overall functioning of European societies. Considering all of the arguments mentioned above, we conclude that as long as civil sector role is complementary to the welfare state programs, it can be considered that food banks do not pose a threat to reduction of the welfare state’s responsibility towards the poor and socially excluded.
- Baglioni, Simone et al. 2017a. Foodsaving in Europe: At the Crossroad of Social Innovation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Baglioni, Simone et al. 2017b. “Surplus Food Recovery and Food Aid: The Pivotal Role of Non-profit Organisations. Insights from Italy and Germany.” Voluntas 28: 2032–2052. doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9746-8.
- Caplan, Pat. 2016. “Big society or broken society? Food banks in the UK.” Anthropology Today 32 (1): 5–9. doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12223.
- Caplan, Pat. 2017. “Win-win? Food poverty, food aid and food surplus in the UK today.” Anthropology Today 33 (3): 17–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12350.
- Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe, (COM (2014) 398).
- European Food Banks Federation. 2019. Towards the next decade together. FEBA Annual Report 2018. Brussels: European Food Banks Federation.
- Eurostat. 2019. “Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day.” Eurostat. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_mdes03&lang=en.
- Finn, Steven. 2011. “A public-private initiative to reduce food waste: A framework for local communities.” Graduate Studies Journal of Organizational Dynamics 1(1), 3–19.
- Garrone, Paola, Marco Melacini, and Alessandro Perego. 2014. “Surplus food recovery and donation in Italy: The upstream process.” British Food Journal 116 (9): 1460–1477. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-02-2014-0076.
- Gonzalez-Torre, Pilar and Jorge Coque. 2016. “How is a food bank managed? Different profiles in Spain.“ Agriculture and Human Values 33 (1): 89–100. doi: 10.1007/s10460-015-9595-x.
- Gonzalez-Torre, Pilar, Sebastian Lozano, and Belarmino Adenso-Diaz. 2017. “Efficiency Analysis of the European Food Banks: Some Managerial Results.” Voluntas 28: 822–838. doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9814-0.
- Hebinck, Aniek et al. 2018. “Capturing change in European food assistance practices: a transformative social innovation perspective.” Local environment 23 (4): 398–413. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1423046.
- King, Geoff et al. 2015. “Understanding Food in the Context of Poverty, Economic Insecurity and Social Exclusion”. Last accessed: 15 April 2020. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/FS307008%20-%20Food%20Poverty%20Final%20Report.pdf.
- Lambie-Mumford, Hannah. 2017. Hungry Britain: The rise of food charity. Bristol: Policy Press.
- Larson, Paul, and Ron McLachlin. 2011. “Supply chain integration under chaotic conditions: Not-for-profit food distribution.” International Journal of Procurement Management 4 (3): 315–322. doi: 10.1504/IJPM.2011.040372.
- Livingstone, Nicola. 2015. “The Hunger Games: Food Poverty and Politics in the UK.” Capital & Class 39 (2): 188–195. doi: 10.1177/0309816815576737.
- Loopstra, Rachel, and Doireann Lalor. 2017. Financial insecurity, food insecurity, and disability: the profile of people receiving emergency food assistance from the Trussell trust foodbank Network in Britain. London: The Trussell trust.
- Loopstra, Rachel et al. 2018. “Impact of welfare benefit sanctioning on food insecurity: a dynamic cross-area study of food bank usage in the UK.” Journal of Social Policy 47 (3): 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S0047279417000915.
- Lorenz, Stephan. 2015. “Having no choice: Social exclusion in the affluent society.” Journal of Exclusion Studies 5 (1): 1–17. doi: 10.5958/2231-4555.2015.00001.7.
- Martins, Isabel et al. 2011. “Modelling the problem of food distribution by the Portuguese food banks.” International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation 2 (3): 313–341. doi: 10.1504/IJMMNO.2011.040795.
- Perry, Jane et al. 2014. Emergency use only: Understanding and reducing the use of food banks in the UK. London: Oxfam GB.
- Riches, Graham. 2011. “Thinking and Acting Outside the Charitable Food Box: Hunger and the Right to Food in Rich Societies.” Development in Practice 21 (4–5): 768–775. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2011.561295.
- Riches, Graham, and Tiina Silvasti. 2014. First World hunger revisited, 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Searchinger, Tim et al. 2019. World Resources Report: Creating a Sustainable Food Future. Washington: World Resources Institute.
- Silvasti, Tiina, and Graham Riches. 2014. “Hunger and Food Charity in Rich Societies: What Hope for the Right to Food?” In First World Hunger Revisited: Food Charity Or the Right to Food?, 2nd edition, eds. Graham Riches and Tiina Silvasti, 191–208. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Simmet, Anja et al. 2017. “The dietary quality of food pantry users: a systematic review of existing literature.” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 117 (4): 563–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.08.015.
- Sosenko, Filip et al. 2019. State of hunger. A study of poverty and food insecurity in the UK. London: The Trussell trust.
- The Global FoodBanking Network. 2019. One network. Toward zero hunger. Chicago: The Global FoodBanking Network.
- Wight, Vanessa et al. 2014. “Understanding the Link between Poverty and Food Insecurity among Children: Does the Definition of Poverty Matter?“ Journal of Children and Poverty 20 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/10796126.2014.891973.