Main topic




The term moral is a homonym, and has multiple meanings in Serbian language. Unlike in English, where we have several different terms, referring to several different notions – ethics, moral, morale, there is a conceptual confusion in regards to the use of the word moral, as it can refer to several different meanings. In the military context, the syntagma moral vojske can mean both moral in the military and military morale. It is precisely due to this polysemy of the word moral in Serbian language, especially in the military discourse, that issues arise. One of the most significant implications of this is the reduction of the meaning of moral to only what would be military morale in English – a psycho-emotional state of motivation and spirit. In this way, the “ethical” meaning of the word moral is neglected and even ignored. This paper aims to show how it is impossible to generate and maintain the desired level of military morale without taking into account the ethical element in the military. Moreover, the author of this paper asserts that we must define an “ethical determinant” of military morale. What this actually means is that, when arguing about what impacts military morale, especially in war, we must not forget the impact that immoral behavior of individuals within our ranks has on overall military morale. Immoral behavior of individuals, particularly neglection of the Jus in Bello norms of the Just War Theory, can undermine the resolve, confidence and belief of their units, as believes about justness of war of witnesses of such behavior can be shook to the core. If combatants do not believe that their fight is a righteous and just one, if they start to question the purpose and justness of their side, we can no longer expect the optimal level of morale in this unit. Neglection of ethical norms (the value-meaning of the term moral in Serbian language) in the context of military ethos and military ethics cannot be without impact on military morale. The two notions are not in conflict with each other – on the contrary, they are complementary, and thus they must both remain a part of what we define as military ethics and military ethos. This mutual relation is perfectly sublimed in the process of defining the ethical determinant of military morale. Elimination of the “ethical” meaning of the word moral from military discourse represents a dangerous and reckless reduction witch can have deep and profound negative implications both on military and society.

keywords :


    • Вокабулар.орг. Доступно на: (приступљено 10.12.2019.)
    • Гроздић, Борислав 2010. „Професионални војни етос и војна професија“, Војно дело: 275-291, Београд: МЦ Одбрана, зима/2010.
    • Гроздић, Борислав. 2011. Војна етика, хрестоматија, Београд: Војноиздавачки завод, 2009.
    • Гроздић, Борислав; Кузмановић, Срећко; Николић, Бранко. 2011. „Војна етика у систему наука и њен однос према наукама у одбрани“, Војно дело: 237-250. Београд: МЦ Одбрана, лето/2011.
    • Дамњановић, Драгољуб; Грујић, Владимир. 2009. „Основни фактори борбеног морала Војске Југославије у току оружаног сукоба НАТО и СР Југославије“, Војно дело: 270-302, Београд: МЦ Одбрана,  3/2009.
    • Даниловић, Неђо. 2001. Морал војске у грађанском рату, Београд: Задужбина Андрејевић и НИЦ Војска.
    • Кузмановић, Срећко. 2008. „Образовни профил официрског кадра као детерминанта морала војске“, Војно дело: 60-90, Београд: МЦ Одбрана, 3/2008.
    • Речник српског језика, 2011. Нови Сад: Матица српска.
    • Сајт Војске Србије, доступно на: (приступљено 12.12.2019.)
    • Станар, Драган. 2019. Праведан рат: између апологије и обуздавања рата, Београд: Добротољубље.
    • Стевановић, Витомир. 2003. Морал и етика, Београд: СМ.
    • Стратегија одбране Републике Србије, 2009. Београд.
    • Babić, Jovan. 2016. „Ethics of War as a Part of Military Ethics”, Didactics of Military Ethics, (ed. Elssner, Th. R. and Janke): 120-126, Leiden/Boston: R. Brill Nijhoff.
    • Babić, Jovan. 2005. Moral i naše vreme, drugo izdanje, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
    • Childs, Sean. 2016. “Soldier’s Morale: Defending a Core Military Capability”, Security Challenges: 43-52, Kingston: Institute for regional security, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016.
    • Clifford, George M. 2007. “Duty at All Costs”, Naval War College Review: 103-128, Newport: U.S. Naval War College, , Vol. 60, No. 1, 2007.
    • Manning, Frederick J. 1994. “Morale and Cohesion in Military Psychiatry” у Military Psychaiatry: Preparing in Peace for War: 1-18. Falls Church: Office of Surgeon General.
    • Mileham, Patrick. 2004. “Civilized Warriors? Professional Discipline, Ethos, and European Armed Forces”, Connections: 75-94, Garmisch-Partenkirchen: Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defence Academies and Security Studies Institutes, , Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2004.
    • Motowidlo, Stephan J. et all. 1976. Motivation, Satisfaction, and Morale in Army Careers: A Review of Theory and Measurements, Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions Inc.
    • Pavićević, Vuko. 1967. Osnovi etike, Beograd: Kultura.
    • Rodin, David. 2006. “The Ethics of Asymmetric War” у The Ethics of War, (ed. Richard Sorabji and David Rodin), 153-168. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Rodin, David. 2008. “Two Emerging Issues of Jus post Bellum: War Termination and the Liability of Soldiers for Crimes of Aggression”, у Jus post Bellum: Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace, (ed. Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner): 56-76, Hague: Asser Press.
    • Ulio, James A. 1941. “Military Morale”, American Journal of Sociology: 321-330, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Vol. 47, No.3, 1941.
    • US Department of the Army. Field Manual on Leadership.
    • Volzer, Majkl. 2010. Pravedni i nepravedni ratovi, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
PERIODICS National Interest 1/2020 1/2020 УДК 355.13 7-22