Main topic




         Welfare state was one of the most important political and economic projects of the twentieth century. Its development has contributed to the spread of communism in the east and the manifestation of certain weaknesses of the market economy model in the west. After the great economic crisis of the 1930s, which broke out in the United States and expanded globally, political and economic thinkers began to search for a model that would be able to correct the weakness of the market. This led to the emergence of Keynes’ theory, which in several decades later, in its various modalities, managed to survive in practice. However, although with its strong social component this model has gained millions of people around the world, over time, it began to show his weaknesses. The state of well-being in time demanded a growing degree of state influence in economic flows, which has suppressed competition, led to inefficiency, a brazen bureaucratic apparatus and a recession. Already at the end of the 1970s, the Western world was spattered by a wave of neoliberalism – that is, libertarianism. Neoliberal waves in the Western world had two main directions – reganism and tatcherism. Ronald Regan and Margaret Thatcher were the first Western leaders to dare to embark on a decommissioning of the state of well-being. They unquestionably accepted the proposals of neo-liberal thinkers, seeing the cutting of state expenditures a way to bring the economy out of the recession. Thanks to the criticism of the welfare state at the academic level by major economic thinkers – like Hayek, Nozick, Friedman and others, and their promotion of the liberal market, the Western world is gradually turning to the decay of the state of welfare state. After the collapse of the Eastern bloc, and the collapse of socialist and communist projects, the liberal model of the market economy imposed itself as a winner in the ideological and practical sphere.

keywords :


    • Фон Хајек, Фридрих. 2012. Пут у ропство. Београд: Службени гласник
    • Brandal, Nik, Bratberg, Oivind and Thorsen, Dag Einar. 2013. The Nordic Model of Social Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
    • Ebeling, Richard. 2007. Marching to Bismarck’s Drummer: The Origins of the Modern Welfare State. 12.05.2018.
    • Friedman, Milton. 1982. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • Haggard, Stephan. 2004. “Institutions and growth in East Asia.” Studies in Comparative International Development 4 (38): 53–81. doi:
    • Hannsgen, Greg and Papadimitriou, B. Dimitri. 2009. “Lessons from the New Deal: Did the New Deal Prolong or Worsen the Great Depression?” Working Paper Collection 581: 1–20. doi:
    • Isaksson, Anders. 1996. Per Albin III: Partiledaren. Stockholm: Wahlstrom and Widstrand
    • Keynes. John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Cambridge: Macmillan Cambridge University Press
    • Locke, John. 1823. The Two Treatises of Civil Government. London: Printed for Thomas Tegg etc.
    • Mill, John Stuart. 1859. On Liberty, 2nd ed. London: John W. Parker and Son
    • Milenković, Dejan. 2013. Javna uprava. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka i Čigoja štampa
    • Morrison, James. 2017. Essential Public Affairs for Journalists. 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    • Podunavac, Milan. 1998. Princip građanstva i poredak politike. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka i Čigoja štampa
    • Sladeček, Michal. 2008. Politička zajednica: koncepcija političke zajednice u liberalno komunitarnom sporu. Beograd: I.P. Filip Višnjić
    • Smith, Adam. 2007. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Lausanne: Meta Libri
    • Veselinov, Dragan. 2009. Politička ekonomija. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka i Čigoja štampa
PERIODICS Political Review 1/2021 1/2021 УДК 321.01:329.12 129-143