Main topic

STATUS AND FLOWS OF NATIONAL POLITICS

CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY NATIONAL IDENTITY OF MONTENEGRO

Abstract

As one of the youngest countries in Europe, Montenegro is a particularly interesting example of how a symbolic competition between two nation-building projects takes place in the political context. The issue of Montenegrin national identity has been at the heart of Montenegrin politics since the late 19th century, but there has never been a clear consensus on who exactly Montenegrins are. Supported by the reconstructed meaning of the Montenegrin nation, the newly formed Montenegrin national consciousness accelerated after the break with Serbia and the declaration of independence on May 21, 2006. Since the break-up of Yugoslavia, Montenegro has gone through transitions from a republic in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) to a member state of Serbia and Montenegro in the period 2003-2006. year, and after that to an independent state from 2006 year. However, the transition of statehood was not the result of a broader popular consensus. The split in the ruling political party of reformed communists, the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS) in 1997, sparked a political struggle between the party’s two former factions. Over a period of 15 years, the changing political programs of the ruling DPS and the opposing Socialist People’s Party (SNP) served as a source for redefining the meaning of ethnic (national) identity. In their competition for social, political or economic resources, Montenegrin elites, by applying political and ethno-cultural state policy and active use of the media, have managed to turn certain facts and events into reference points for the citizens of Montenegro by identifying themselves. Therefore, these events became the basis of belonging to a community and at the same time helped to separate the specific community of Montenegro from Srpska.

keywords :

References

    • Banac, Ivo. 1984. The National Question in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    • Bieber, Florian. 2003. Montenegro in Transition Problems of identity and Statehood. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
    • Boundaries, E. Georg 1997. “Cohesion and Switching: On We-Groups in Ethnic national and Religion Forms”. In Rethinking Nationalism and Ethnicity: The Struggle for Meaning and Order in Europe, eds. Hans-Rudolf Wicker (ed.), 251-273, Oxford: Berg Publishers.
    • Brković, Savo. 1974. O postanku i razvoju crnogorske nacije. Titograd: Grafički zavod.
    • Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Group. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Douglas, Anthony Smith. 1979. Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. New York: NYU Press.
    • Đukanović, Dragan. 2014. „Identitetska pitanja” i linije unutrašnjih podela u Crnoj Gori”. Međunarodni problemi, br. 3-4: 395-422. DOI: 10.2298/MEDJP1404395D.
    • Đurković, Miša, Montenegro: Headed for New Divisions, Conflict Studies Research Centre 07/2009.
    • Džankić, Jelena. 2014., Reconstructing the Meaning of Being “Montenegrin”, Slavic Review, Vol. 73, No. 2: 347-371. DOI: 10.5612/slavicreview.73.2.347.
    • Екмечић, Милорад. 2008. Дуго кретање између клања и орања. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
    • George, W. White. 2000. Nationalism and Territory. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    • Glušica, Rajka 2010. Crnogorski jezik u čeljustima nacionalizma, Riječ: časopis za nauku o jeziku i književnosti, br.4: 25-45.
    • Greenberg, David Robert. 2008. Language and Identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its disintegration. Oxford: University Press.
    • Guntram H. Herb, David H. Kaplan. 1999. Nested Identities: nationalism, Territory, Scale. Laham: Rowman and Littlefield.
    • Hobsbawn, Eric. 1997. On History. London: Abacus.
    • Ikegami, Eiko. 2000. A Sociological Theory of Public: Identity and Culture as Emergent Properties in Networks, Social Research 67(4). 989-1029.
    • Ивић, Павле. 1986. Српски народ и његов језик. Београд: Српска књижевна задруга.
    • Ičević, Dušan. 1998. Crnogorska Nacija. Beograd: Forum za etničke odnose.
    • International Crisis Group, Montenegro,s Referendum: Europe report 42, Bruxelles. Последњи приступ 10. мај 2020, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/18060/b042_montenegro_s_referendum.pdf.
    • James, Paul. 1997. Nation Formation: Towards a Theory of Abstract Community. London: Sage.
    • Keiichi, Kubo. 2007. The issue of Independence and Ethnic Identity in Montenegro, Southeastern Europe 32(1):163-180. DOI: 10.1163/187633307X00101.
    • Lilla, Mark 2001. The Reckless Mind: Intellectuals in Politics. New York: Review of books.
    • Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and international Society. Cambridge: University Press.
    • Милосављевић, Бранислав. 2019. „Безбедносна процена као чинилац стратегије националне безбедности Републике Србије.“ Докторска дисертација. Универзитет у Београду: Факултет безбедности
    • Morrison, Kenneth. 2009. Montenegro, a modern history. London: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.
    • Morrison, Kenneth. 2018. Nationalism, Identity and Statehood in Post-Yugoslav Montenegro. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Popović, M. Milan. 2002. Montenegrin mirror:polity in turmoil: (1991 – 2001). Podgorica. Nansen Dialogue Centre.
    • Popović, M. Milan.2010. Podijeljena nacija: identitet, država, vlast. Cetinje: IVPE.
    • Раковић, Александар. 2017. „Улога религијског интервенционизма у распаду СФР Југославије“. У Срби и пропаст Југославије: приручник, ур. Антић Чедомир и други, 93-114. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
    • Ramet, P. Sabrina. 2005. “The Politics of the Serbian Orthodox Church“. In: Serbia Since 1989, politics and society under Milosevic and after, eds. Sabrina P.Ramet and Vjeran Pavlaković, 255- 285, Washington: University of Press.
    • Rastoder, Šerbo. 2003. “A short review of the history of Montenegro”, In: Montenegro in transition: Problems of Identity and Statehood, ed. Bieber Florian, 107-138. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
    • Simićević, Nikola. 2008. Crna Gora i srpsko pitanje, Nova srpska politička misao. Последњи приступ 10. мај 2020. http://starisajt.nspm.rs/Debate/2007_simicevic3.htm.
    • Tuathail, Ó. Gearóid. 2000. Borderless worlds? Problematising discourses of deterritorialisation, In: Geopolitics at the End of the Twentieth Century: The Changing World Political Map, eds. Nurit Kliot and David Newman, 139-154. London: Frank Cass Publishers.
    • Ustav Republike Crne Gore, „Službeni list Republike Crne Gore“, br. 48/92.
    • Ustav Republike Crne Gore, „Službeni list Republike Crne Gore“, br. 01/07.
    • Uprava za statistiku Crne Gore, Popis stanovništva 2003. Последњи приступ 10. мај 2020. https://www.monstat.org/cg/page.php?id=57&pageid=57.
    • Witmeyer, M. Joseph. 2003. Elits and Popular Nationalism, British Journal of Sociology 53 (3). 321-341. DOI: 10.1080/0007131022000000536.
    • Wicker, Rudolf-Hans. 1997. Rethinking Nationalism and Ethnicity: The Struggle for Meaning and Order in Europe. Oxford: Berg.
    • Zakon o statusu potomaka dinastije Petrović Njegoš, „Službeni list Crne Gore”, br. 36/2011.
    • Zakon o državnim simbolima i Danu državnosti Crne Gore, „Službeni list Rеpublike Crne Gore“, br. 47/2004.
PERIODICS National Interest 3/2020 3/2020 УДК 323.1(497.16) 129-157
ç