Main topic

DOMAINS AND POSSIBILITIES OF LOCAL DEMOCRACY IN SERBIA

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF YOUTH ORGANIZATION IN LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT UNITS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA – PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS

Abstract

The paper analyzes the institutional mechanisms of youth participation in the creation and implementation of public policies, with a focus on the local level. The paper highlights the importance of young people’s social capital for the development of a healthy and sustainable community. Through active participation, formal and informal association, and continuous communication with local institutions, young people develop opportunities to express and fulfill their rights and needs, while contributing to the overall development of the local community. The Law on Youth, which was adopted in the Republic of Serbia over 10 years ago, determines the ways of organizing youth, but there have been numerous problems in its implementation. Using the metod of content analysis of legal norms, primarily the Law on Youth and National Youth Strategies, institutional problems of youth organization are presented, and specific normative solutions that could become part of a new youth law are proposed. Special emphasis is placed on the institutional framework of youth organization at the local level, where youth offices, youth spaces and youth work are analyzed. The results of the analysis have shown numerous problems resulting from unclear and insufficiently developed provisions of the law on these issues. Additionally, the paper presents comparative solutions for the same issues in certain European Union member states and Western Balkans countries.

keywords :

References

    Azanjac, Tanja, Donatella Bradic, Djordje Krivokapić, and Tatjana Stojic. 2014. Youth and Public Policy in Serbia. Youth Policy Press.

    Campbell, David and Nancy Erbstein. 2012. “Engaging youth in community change: three key implementation principles.” Community Development 43 (1): 63‒79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.645042.

    Henn, Matt, Mark Weinstein, and Sarah Hodgkinson. 2007. “Social Capital and Political Participation: Understanding the Dynamics of Young People’s Political Disengagement in Contemporary Britain.” Social Policy and Society 6 (4): 467‒479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746407003818.

    Ignjatović, Suzana i Smiljka Tomanović. 2011. „Socijalni kapital i prostor.ˮ Sociologija i prostor 49 (3): 269‒289. doi: https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.49.3.1.

    Ilišin, Vlasta, Dejana Bouillet, Dunja Potočnik, i Ivona Mendeš. 2006. Mladi između želja i mogućnosti – položaj, problem i potrebe mladih Zagrebačke županije. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu.

    Janković, Dejan. 2020. Društvene promene i ruralni razvoj: značaj socijalnog kapitala, participacije i društvenih mreža. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Poljoprivredni fakultet.

    Jarrett, L. Robin, Patrick J. Sullivan, and Natasha D. Watkins. 2005. “Developing social capital through participation in organized youth programs: qualitative insights from three programs.” Journal of community psychology 33 (1): 41‒55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20038.

    Kapucu, Naim. 2011. “Social Capital and Civic Engagement.” International Journal of Social Inquiry. 4 (1): 23‒43.

    Knight, Yolande. 2009. “Talkin’ ‘both my generation: a brief introduction to generational theory.” Planet 21 (1): 13‒15. doi: https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2009.00210013.

    Milenković, Dejan. 2012. Komentar Zakona o mladima. Beograd: Beogradska otvorena škola.

    Milenković, Dejan. 2013. Participacija i učešće mladih u društvenim procesima u Republici Srbiji. Beograd: Centar za novu politiku.

    Milenković, Dejan. 2023. Komparativna analiza zakona o mladima u Evropskim zemljama. Beograd: UNICEF.

    Nacionalna asocijacija kancelarija za mlade. n.d. „Istorijat.ˮ Nacionalna asocijacija kancelarija za mlade. Poslednji pristup 20. jun 2023. https://asocijacijakzm.org/istorijat/.

    Nacionalna strategija za mlade u Republici Srbiji za period od 2023. do 2030. godine, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 9/23.

    Nacionalna strategija za mlade za period od 2009. do 2014. godine, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 55/08.

    Nacionalna strategija za mlade za period od 2015. do 2025. godine, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 22 od 27. februara 2015.

    Pavićević, Olivera. 2011. „Pozitivni i negativni aspekti društvenog kapitala – slučaj postkomunističkih društava.ˮ Sociologija 54 (3): 501‒526. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1203501P.

    Stoker, Gery i David Marsh. 2005. Teorije i metode političke znanosti. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.

    Tomanović, Smiljka, Dragan Stanojević, Isidora Jarić, Dušan Mojić, Slađana Dragišić Labaš, Milana Ljubičić, i Ivana Živadinović. 2012. Mladi – naša sadašnjost. Istraživanje socijalnih biografija mladih u Srbiji. Beograd: Čigoja štampa; Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.

    U Report Srbija. 2023. „Ankete.ˮ U Report Srbija. Poslednji pristup 23. jun 2023. https://serbia.ureport.in/opinions/.

    Ustav Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 98/06, 115/21.

    Watson-Thompson, Jomella, Stephen B. Fawcett, and Jerry A. Schultz. 2008. “A framework for community mobilization to promote healthy youth development.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34 (3): S72‒S81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.12.016.

    Woodman, Dan. 2016. “The sociology of generations and youth studies.” In Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood, second edition, ed. Endy Furlong, 20‒27. New York: Routledge.

    Zakon o mladima, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 50/11 i 116/22 – dr. zakon.

PERIODICS SERBIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 3/2023 3/2023 УДК 352.07(497.11) 51-75